IlIlIllI

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by IlIlIllI 2y ago

   That briefing was written by people who clearly do not understand what they're reading. For a start, this is factually incorrect: > The Cass Report reveals that it discarded huge amounts of medical evidence, both from the UK and acr
2. 2.▲
   by IlIlIllI 3y ago

   Does it really matter if this small piece of background information is unsourced? A historical treatment of trans identity isn't the focus of the report. Seems like rather an irrelevant criticism to be honest. I don't quite unders
3. 3.▲
   by IlIlIllI 3y ago

   Please do consider reading the report I linked. It really does go into considerable detail on the evidence-based rationale for its recommendations. You may find insightful this quote from the report: "Although some think the clinical a
4. 4.▲
   by IlIlIllI 3y ago

   It is not a "vague demand" for evidence. Please see the Methodology section of the final report of the Cass Review for the detail of what is considered evidence-based medicine, both generally and within the context of the review:
5. 5.▲
   by IlIlIllI 3y ago

   https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-r... "Given that the vast majority of young people started on puberty blockers proceed from puberty blockers to masculinising/ feminising hormon
6. 6.▲
   by IlIlIllI 3y ago

   The report is very clear that the claim of these being "life-saving treatments" is unsupported by evidence. Subjecting children to such serious medical interventions should be evidence led, not ideologically driven.