Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
IanCal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
481.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
> A high school student would use copy/paste and the urls would be perfect duplicates.. Did the LLM have this?
482.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
If you base all your tech workings on the promises of CEOs you'll fail badly, you should not be surprised by this.
483.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Intelligence isn't the same as "can exactly replicate text". I'm hopefully smarter than a calculator but it's more reliable at maths than me. Also there's a huge gulf between "some people claim it can do X
484.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I read your comments. Did you read mine? You can pass them into chatgpt or claude or whatever premium services you pay for to summarise them for you if you want. > Trust me, it sucks Ok. I'm convinced. > and under-delivers. Compa
485.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
> Many of us mastered the hard problem of navigating various abstraction layers of computer over the years, only to be told, we now effing dont know how to write a few sentences in English? Come on. If you're trying to one shot stuf
486.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I don't have an issue with that, or the article, it's the comments about "ah but in Europe they do X" like every road looks like Amsterdam.
487.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
This isn't ai maximalist though, it's explicitly pointing out something that regularly does not work! > Sure, but conceivably, you could also be informed of this second hand, through any publication about LLMs, so it is very
488.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I wish people would stop assuming that an area with 500M people, more than 20 countries and far more cultures are one addressable block. Some places are, others are absolutely awful. > Another advantage is that narrower roads make driver
489.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
They're moderately unreliable text copying machines if you need exact copying of long arbitrary strings. If that's what you want, don't use LLMs. I don't think they were ever really sold as that, and we have better tools
490.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
It's pretty clearly worded to me, they don't use LLMs enough to know how to use them successfully. If you use them regularly you wouldn't see a set of urls without thinking "Unless these are extremely obvious links to ma
491.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
They easily check a bunch of those boxes. > why don´t we stop pretending that we as users are stupid and don´t know how to use them This is in response to someone who saw a bunch of URLs coming out of it and was surprised at a bunch of t
492.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Editing tools are easy to add it’s just you have to pick what things to give them because too many and they struggle as it uses up a lot of context. Still, as costs come down multiple steps to look for tools becomes cheaper too. I’d like to
493.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Assuming that includes reading, there’s a definite case for having your coding assistant being able to easily see the designs.
494.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
That the tools do this kind of thing? They do, they’ll go through pretty long multi step processes to find things and edit them. They run tests, check output, see it’s wrong and go and add debug statements, rerun, try and fix things, rerun,
495.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Would a figure of 60 books per year change the argument? 100? 200? There’s a realistic cap on total number of books consumed by a large enough group of people to matter economically.
496.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
The models definitely can get confused if they have multiple copies in their history though, regardless of whether your latest changes are in.
497.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I have not advocated for anything. At best you could say I advocated for talking to a professional, and I do. I certainly didn’t say it would help them (try reading all the words). > Your perception that you have been helped is not comin
498.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
This is exceptionally early days (hours really), and perhaps over sharing a little personally but I found the same things hard and easy that you describe for working - personally I would work either by rapidly jumping between things (becomi
499.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
No. Search is part of this, but that doesn’t necessarily work from an error message. It doesn’t mean you get the relevant parts of the thread either. It certainly doesn’t mean you get a populated meeting invite for a relevant team.
500.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I’d also be surprised if the models are better at writing code in some custom schema (assuming that’s not z3s native structure) than writing code in something else. Decent models can write pretty good code and for a lot of mistakes can fix
501.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Really? I've signed up to bluesky and tiktok and on both have seen literal porn extremely early without engaging directly (such as liking or responding, speed of scrolling could be something).
502.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Images are the clear thing that is typically remote - sometimes to the point of an email that’s entirely just an image, or rather a link to an image.
503.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
This has nothing to do with harmful content it’s about managing children’s data you collect.
504.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Somewhat missed by many comments proclaiming that it’s sigmoidal is that sigmoid curves exhibit significant growth after it stops looking exponential. Unless you think things have already hit a dramatic wall you should probably assume fur
505.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Not if you aren’t PAYE and I’m not sure there are any identity checks if you are.
506.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
More than one job at a time is entirely legal though.
507.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
Showing a birth certificate isn’t a particularly hard bar to pass if you want to fake that you’re a national to be fair. You need just that and a printed letter and there’s nothing an employer will do beyond copying that (afaik you can’t lo
508.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
No, those are still the ways of proving you have the right to work, it’s only if you’re not a national that you need the share code.
509.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
The share code stuff is not for nationals. It’s not clear to me exactly how it works and whether it’s scalable.
510.
▲
by
IanCal
1y ago
I really disagree on the autonomy side. In fact the Wikipedia page explicitly says that’s not required so whether you agree with that concept or not it’s not a universal point. > The concept does not, in principle, require the system to
More ›