ISP_throwaway

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   Ah, I see the reason for the confusion. I thought you were an ISP, not an end user.
2. 2.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   > Yours might but mine ran out years ago. Out of interest, why didn’t you re-up when you still could? You could still get some two years ago.
3. 3.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   This is a great way of enhancing the Great Firewall of China: simply cut off the rest of the world that is using IPv4.
4. 4.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   Good thing you are a dictator. No need to worry about silly things like the popularity of such a move, the cost involved and the mountain of e-waste produced.
5. 5.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   That’s fine, each to their own. You might not be alone, but you should take into account that you are an atypical customer. Different customers value different things. In the list of things people value in their broadband, IPv6 doesn’t even
6. 6.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   I wasn’t making a blanket statement about static IPv4 availability, rather it was an observation from our own market. That being said, most carriers or major ISPs aren’t actually that hard up for IPv4 space. By no means will static IPv4s be
7. 7.▲
   by ISP_throwaway 5y ago

   The way I see it, IPv6 is somebody else’s problem. You can’t make money with IPv6 and nobody wants it. From a customer support perspective, IPv6 is just another problem nobody needs. We, and all the other ISPs in our market, have enough IPv