IIAOPSW

51 ms·

661.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Don't you hate it when someone interrupts your train of thought.
662.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35129448#35133213
663.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
They take the mathematicians meaning. Open does not mean not closed.
664.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I don't care about multiple types of parenthesis per se, I do care about there being a spanning set of grammatical constructs. I don't think period and comma alone would be enough. You need to have constructs for compressing and a
665.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
If you think that's funny, I've got a ton of great news to show you!
666.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I must say, truth is an absolute defense, and I'm certainly one to both value calories down the gullet crude and efficiently, and to not be terribly aware of what goes on in the font fetishizing circles (no disrespect). But I do unders
667.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I know your examples are intentionally extreme to prove a point, I'm biting anyway. Parenthetical type grammar with an explicit start character and end character is pivotal for encoding information unambiguously. You can't replica
668.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
.... -.-- .--. .... . -. ... .- -. -.. .--. . .-. .. --- -.. .. ... .- .-.. .-.. .. -. . . -..
669.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I get you mean chatGPT has solved the problem, but it feels as if its solved the problem without answering the deep questions. We still don't really get how the brain does it or the answer to any of the deep linguistic questions, inste
670.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
There's no shortage of mathematical notation and delimiting characters. Eg you could write your machine screws as .25+20i. Obviously you raise e to the power of your screw and you get a rotation rate in the complex plane, and a width o
671.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The "unreadable" sample is very much readable. We can all read it. No one is tripping up trying to figure out what a "money-rather" is.
672.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I was expecting a transition into "creative reviews", written from the perspective of some sort of zany character on vacation, such as a half drunk island-hoping writer disillusioned with being in a tourist trap for a week, or a r
673.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I'm sure that's a ton of fun for anyone trying to write a natural language parser. LMAO using the end brackets as start brackets and vice versa.
674.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Oh this is easy. m dash: -- n dash: -. .. I take it few people find morse code puns funny anymore. Seriously, what's the point of this pedantry. What does having 3 basically identical characters add to the language other than a pointle
675.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
It sucks at morse code.
676.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The default is moderate, which seems to mean "filters irrelevant porn from innocent queries"
677.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I don't see how this could possibly go wrong. Its not like the machine ever outputs superficial bullshit explanations which fall apart under scrutiny but would seem fine to non-technical execs. Utopia at last.
678.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I also have a Masters in physics. You really don't need to explain the FT to me. Or the QFT for that matter. Or any of this stuff. I already know. You understand it all yet you somehow overlooked it in my original comment. The first co
679.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
There's two camps interested in studying the brain. One is interested primarily in figuring out human physiological function, of which the brain is a most difficult challenge. The other is interested in figuring out consciousness and c
680.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I don't know how superimposed waves in finely tuned timing loops with non-linear interference translates into heads of attention, and honestly I suspect a lot of the things difficult to do with heads of attention (and other approaches
681.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
To say what the other guy said but shorter, real (continuous) numbers are uncountably infinite because if you tried to write out a real number you'd need a countably infinite number of digits. For every desired length of precision n, t
682.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I'm not so sure on the digital part. I don't want to type a lot, but there's a lot of scientific backing to the premise that the brain waves, not the on/off states of neurons, are the salient feature upon which reasoning
683.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You're conflating skepticism that LLM's "solve the mystery" with contrarian "AI denialism". The former is very sanely grounded and frankly there's a lot about the brain that is still a mystery (yes the alg
684.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
In the limit of 100% confidence of prediction, does it not equate a model? Put another way, when all the probabilities get set to either 100% or 0%, do you not simply arrive back at classical True/False logic?
685.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
|-----long timing loop / top of parse tree-----| | | |-shorter / child node -| |-shorter / child node-| | |
686.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
This is simply impossible. The premise that the brain is a big lookup table is appealing, and that sort of 1 neuron = 1 represented item concept certainly happens at the initial stages of the sensory pipeline, but if you attempt to scale it
687.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I respond to everything with "congratulations" or "I'm sorry to hear that", chosen at random.
688.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I had to unsubscribe from lamp. Too many aardvarks posting family friends.
689.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>Cashier: How are you today? >Me: Miserable. I'd like an Iced Latte. ... >Barista: what type of milk? >Me: Straight out the cow. >Me: 7/8ths. >Me: Chocolate. Maybe I'm just a high entropy individual.
690.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I'm not hopeful that "seeing the map" (multimodal training) will make the difference everyone is hoping for. The transit map is going to be the exact same information as the lists, but coded in the learned design language of

More ›