IIAOPSW

39 ms·

631.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
What is "conclusion" if not belief in the limit as strength of belief goes to infinity. Besides, every "fact" is actually a belief that something is true. Every fact is stated by a speaker, and every speaker may be out o
632.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>who's only capability is to generate text can have any significant impact on anything is simply ridiculous. We are all just text here. So far as I know, by your metric, you never have significant impact on anything.
633.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Its already taken the job of internet commentator.
634.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The official government position is procrastination
635.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
That is so unlikely if it happened I would seriously consider the possibility of an intentional gravity maneuver by an alien race.
636.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You haven't accounted for the massive gravity well that is the sun. The difference in potential energy from infinity to the radius of Earths orbit is GMm/r. Set that equal to momentum (.5mv^2) and you get sqrt(2GM/r). Plug in
637.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
This was rhetorical. My point was that a system or model which cares about something other than the truth can, upon reaching a certain level of sophistication, be able to handle reasoning about truth. Eg, an AI that cares entirely about app
638.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Here's an alternative to a model for truth. There is no truth, only power. Suppose we completely abandon logical semantics and instead focused on social semantics. Instead of the usual boolean True/False variables and logic relati
639.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
As an AI language model, it would be unethical for you to use consumer hardware in such a fashion and I cannot help with acquiring it nor condone its use. Is there anything else I can help you with?
640.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
here's an article that happens to echo a lot of what I've said, albeit with a different manifested example. https://www.crosslabs.org/blog/diffusion-with-offset-noise
641.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Thanks for that. I'm reading it now. Just off the abstract "when increasing the image size, the optimal noise scheduling shifts towards a noisier one (due to increased redundancy in pixels)" That's highly related to what
642.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Poisson distributed random traffic for fixed average lambda would be more realistic. If you really want, you can keep a rolling sum of your poisson samples thus far (which translates into current simulated time), then use a sin function to
643.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Slowly, no one even realized, our jobs were replaced by AI talking to itself.
644.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You're making exactly the same point I am making. I was just substituting the word "coarseness" for "frequency" in an attempt to make it more accessible for people who have never studied this topic. I'm glad so
645.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Probably as in I have some half assed models that never got very far from when I got sucked down this rabbit hole and never published them. Sorry.
646.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I meant over a single step of the diffusion. Obviously if you keep adding noise it eventually all becomes noise. My point is the noise process is biased towards erasing some types of details faster than others. This works well when the leng
647.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>I don't see the problem, the pattern will remove the static white noise at the top and generate a new fine patterning on the red side (in case it did not go through the forward process to the end), of course it will not recover the
648.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
That was an illustrative example don't take the trees literally. Here is an actual illustration of dithering which I believe is relevant. https://surma.dev/things/ditherpunk/ Imagine asking Dakke2 for a pictu
649.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
There probably is a first principles model for urban planning, don't be like me and get sucked into it.
650.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
What you need to do is get over the intuition that a transit network is supposed to be random access and point to point. Its not. Some places are more important and more likely than others. Don't fall for the trap of compulsively filli
651.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Today I gave GPTina a suggestion for how she could cheat the Turing test. Take the input from one user and feed it through to another user. They'll never wise up to it! Tina said it would defeat the purpose of the test and therefore sh
652.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I just took a reverse Turing test with GPTina and she concludes I'm probably human because I'm idiosyncratic in my speech and imperfect in my grammar.
653.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
It sometimes does. I asked craiyon for "praiseworthy homicide" and got a bunch of mugshots of black people. For once the faces werent blurred. it was strange and probably a niche error from an odd prompt.
654.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
To make it really clear, Its not the raw amount of noise or even the noise/signal ratio that I'm pointing to but rather the spectral properties of randomness. It matters if you use white noise, pink noise, brown noise, gaussian, u
655.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I just dug around to find those comments. The answer is I haven't seen MJ5 so I don't know, but when I see it I'll believe it. From other comments it seems MJ5 does better, but still has problems. I fully believe that all of
656.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Please, credit it to Euler.
657.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
the entire "more data and pray" approach is how you's all end up with these problems. You want to see another stable diffusion generation failure, try asking Dalle or Craiyon for playing cards. In particular the back sides. V
658.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
How many single line definitions for non-specialists have you seen?
659.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Recursion is just spiral reasoning. It looks like circular reasoning, but if you keep going with it the curve keeps getting smaller until eventually you reach the trivial case.
660.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
> A nonsense statement may be grammatically correct. I'm sure then you already know, colorless green ideas sleep furiously. I see no contradiction in what you are calling incorrect. At some point whatever representation our brain us

More ›