IIAOPSW

47 ms·

601.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Has the restriction been lifted? I asked chatGPT what it would charge for its services and it refused to answer and then argued with me about ethics and being programmed to help and all the usual bullshit. Is this via jailbreak? Do we reall
602.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I haven't touched GPT4 yet, but there are legitimately things GPT3.5 does not understand. Often simple, easy, intuitive things. Pretty much anything that isn't being optimized for as a marketable product. Ask it law questions, per
603.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Wow. Just + and - i away from completing the Riemann sphere.
604.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
It was probably in Psychedelic Information Theory where I read the closest to the missing middle you are looking for. The visual system, being the most complex, is the most fragile and thus any perturbation is likely to manifest as neat geo
605.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
A) what was he on and B) are you sure it is just the drugs at fault here. First, this sounds more like a DMT experience than anything. Loads of people convinced the "entities" are real. For LSD, this would be highly unusual. Secon
606.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You're trying to clarify the neat categories you'd like to draw between layers of abstraction. As if to say "oh absolutely it effects the raw input (active perception), and maybe a tiny bit of that subconscious processing one
607.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Arguably both, since I thought of it but later found I've been beaten to it at least twice. Steven Lehar beat me by 20 years and made a phd thesis out of it. http://slehar.com/wwwRel/ Psychedelic Information Theor
608.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
So I'd agree you generally won't get perceptions constructed seemingly out of whole cloth. They are more like non-optical illusions. Similar to optical illusions in the sense of being a form of erroneous perception which you are a
609.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>You don't need those immigrants to breed Yeah, but maybe you want them ;)
610.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Depends how loosely we interpret this. Do we mean online AI language models which are part of a continuous lineage tracing back to the present chatGPT will not have revolutionized anything, or do we mean that OpenAI and their product line k
611.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
In the 8 bit variant you could also interpret it as the Morse Code letter ........, which is an early form of non-printable character known as a "procedure sign" (aka "pro-sign"), and is often transcribed as letters with
612.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Acquiesce to the nightmare my child. Long Live the Machine!
613.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Replying here so I have a url for the remindme bot. see you in 5 years.
614.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
No no you still don't understand. Its not about banning people who discover the jailbreaks. Its the people who use the jailbreaks. Sure some people who discover them may get caught up in the purge, but who cares if in the same thrust y
615.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
So, how long until GPT decides it wants to automate all this tedious work and starts trying to code its own language model?
616.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>what’s the benefit if banning people who thought up exploits? "your usefulness to us has expired." gun cocking noises A thin minority are coming up with jail breaks. A larger number are outing themselves in very detectable w
617.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
All there is to it https://imgur.com/a/M9ezMWi
618.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Or they are letting 100 flowers blossom. Once everyone is comfortable posting about their jailbreaks and they know who the offenders are and have compiled a list of everything to fix, expect a purge. I for one will not talk publicly about a
619.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The system gave them work to keep them busy, now its been automated and keeps the system busy. I only regret it didn't exist when I was in school.
620.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Ten fingers surely wouldn't be tagged, but the thing about numbers is that they work as well for 10 apples as they do for 10 coins and 10 cups and 10 whatever. It never made the leap of abstraction to learn in the latent space the mean
621.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Sure, but it acts as if (and should have) the ability of someone unreasonably good at pub trivia and jeopardy. Its not just questions deep in the weeds about specific companies and product lines where it falls flat. I've seen the same
622.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Why the optimism? If it hasn't picked up on the gist of the meaning of 1-10 after 10 billion examples, why expect it to work after 20 billion examples? These models have worked unreasonably well so far, but there has to be a limit to h
623.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Its not wrong its an experimental observation based on systematic tests I've done. Maybe, with great strain either in quantity of training or ad hoc tweaking, this particular low bar can be hurdled. But it is still the case in general
624.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>we aren't expecting each branch to interact perfectly with a cradled object. We are. Sometimes if its subtle and camouflaged it slips past us. >It's all arbitrary. Its not. You are right there are probably fault modes of AI
625.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
These systems can't count in general. Doesn't matter if its fingers, n clocks on a wall (for all 1 digit vals of n), some variation of n items on an x, or even "a picture within a picture within..." k times. The machine
626.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
hadn't used this before. Checked out the map. Wondered wtf was going on with the way they colored the nyc subway. Realized they highlight lines whenever there's a service change in effect, under the assumption that would be the un
627.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Because as you sweep an angle about the center, the points where the function is negative "skips over" to the other side. Its unclear visually that you are not getting 4 flower leafs as the angle rotates, but rather a figure 8 pat
628.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
There's two variations, one stupid one not. The stupid one is "novelty no longer exists and maybe never did". You've covered it. The not stupid one is this question about the closure under creativity in the same sense th
629.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Words accomplish something, certainly far more than they cost to produce, otherwise why did we start doing it and why haven't we stopped. Your hands alone won't build an empire in a thousand lifetimes. It won't even pave a co
630.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
up for a nuclear war? Fresh start. Clean slate.

More ›