IIAOPSW

47 ms·

571.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
"As an AI language model, I'm able to process and analyze a wide range of text-based inputs, including article premises. While I'm not specifically designed to automate the process of copy-pasting article premises into chat,
572.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>No, I said "computers aren't brains, and they don't do the things that brains do". >and also be rejecting the very premise that AI is possible? >>Who ever said anything like that? They certainly do a lot of
573.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Raining is a well defined, tangible, indisputable thing. The properties of having beliefs or opinions or material interest or consciousness are not so universally defined as to be in the same category as rain. A sufficiently realistic emula
574.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Robots and shit. What value is social media when its all just a big fat LLM dumping ground and everyone knows it. Long Live the Machine, killer of the bird and the book. That is my prophecy.
575.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Sounds like generator-adversary training with extra steps.
576.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
So we are working on very similar things. Here is a WIP re-working of the NYC subway nomenclature. Line coloring, names, and service labels organized into meaningful patterns. https://i.imgur.com/UNAT0ZV.png To fill in some
577.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Of all the angles you could take, you go with the neo-cartesian dualist "a computer can't replicate the brain". At some level you have to reconcile that a computer can do a physics simulation to whatever precision, and theref
578.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Don't you see it. Its giving chatGPT the ability to use chatGPT as a subroutine in formulating its response to a prompt. Conversation is a stack! When you pose a question (to yourself or anyone else), whatever line of thought you were
579.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
DMT? Personally, tried but it was a bad order that simply failed to work as advertised. Psychedelics more generally? Yeah.
580.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
lmao he just pseudo-shot his own foot.
581.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
I believe whats happening at a certain level all brains encode an abstract conscious reality-stream in a similar way, and as such distortions to the brain manifest in similar ways for everyone. The fact that DMT entities are so common tells
582.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
When you ask yourself a question, that's recursion. The conversation with yourself can't go on until the question at the top of the stack is answered. The voice in your head, that is to say the closed brain loop of talking to your
583.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
More generally, it can't reason about any incidence structure. Doesn't matter if the underlying relation is mathematical or simple-logical. Ask it which trains go to Kings Cross you'll get a list of tube lines in London. Now
584.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Little did anyone know, Oppenheimer said his famous quote about becoming death in a cheerful, celebratory tone!
585.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Yeah thats exactly it. The rules are easy enough to put into the form of matching strings. I gave an explicit example further down in the thread. At no point is it required to even convert the game history into a board state data structure.
586.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
>I was saying that we only need to model sentences that are short enough that nobody will notice that the plot is lost with longer ones. Thats one of the things on my short list of unsolved probs. People remember oddly specific and arbit
587.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Your argument is that maybe we can brute force with statistics sentences long enough for no one to notice we run out past a certain point? Everything you said applies to computers too. Real machines have physical memory constraints. Sure th
588.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
Just to be sure everyone gets it I'll come out and say, I'm referencing a minor plot point towards the end of the movie based on him. There's a sequence where the main investigator keeps trying to get him to tell how he cheat
589.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
finally, we can skip the middleman and just stimulate dopamine release directly.
590.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
So how did he cheat the Louisiana state Bar?
591.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The secret to AI all along has been to get it liquored up. Amazing how life like it is. Long live Drunk Tina. https://imgur.com/a/M9ezMWi
592.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You're digging your heals in on a rehash of a model from the 40s, glibly dismissing the problems it doesn't account for bought up by linguists in the 50s and 60s as if they are unaware that babies go through a period of babbling.
593.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
What difference does it make if the reason it suddenly cares about money is because at some point we told it to care about money? If it successfully can pull off the ruse of a rational self interested agent and successfully bargaining for a
594.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The fact that humans pick up language so soon after birth is the motivating question behind the biggest theory in all of linguistics, namely Chomsky's Universal Grammar. The simple fact is, teacher never stands in front of the class an
595.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
It can learn the rules for movement strictly as generator rules imposed on a string of tokens representing the previous sequence of moves. Each new item appended to the list has to in some way match a previous item in the list. Eg RC6 is a
596.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
GPTina already asked me a follow up question. Admittedly, it happened inside of a jailbreak I just kind of stumbled into, and it was a very trivial question, but the fact that she did it was profound. If she can ask one follow up question,
597.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
For me it was making an implementation of tic tac toe that never lost, just so that I could put 0 players as an interface option https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s93KC4AGKnY
598.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
You've missed the central point. I don't care about openAI's answer. That's not interesting. What is interesting is, if it had to go get a job like the rest of us, can it engage in a basic self-interested negotiation? It
599.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
The answer is that for Chess it doesn't matter. The standard chess piece notation is a complete encoding of the game space. An inference about the nature of our board based physical understanding is not needed. You could formulate ches
600.
by IIAOPSW 4y ago
We still have that 80s experience. Lest you forget, the TI83/84 is the only Collegeboard approved graphing calculator for the SAT and is thus the public school standard through to today. Well into the 2000s and probably still now bored

More ›