IEnjoyTapNinja

5 ms·

1.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
It was just a thought experiment: [UPDATE 2/6/23 - in communication with AEROSPACE - Col Hamilton admits he "mis-spoke" in his presentation at the Royal Aeronautical Society FCAS Summit and the 'rogue AI drone simul
2.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
As expected, it was complete fabrication: "[UPDATE 2/6/23 - in communication with AEROSPACE - Col Hamilton admits he "mis-spoke" in his presentation at the Royal Aeronautical Society FCAS Summit and the 'rogue
3.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
The Guardian hasn't done any due diligence and is spreading fake news based on an interviewer who seems to have misunderstood the context of the exercise. "He notes that one simulated test saw an AI-enabled drone tasked with a SEA
4.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
I don't understand in what scenario this would be possible. If the drone needs a 'go' from a human operator to fire at the enemy, surely it also needs a 'go' from the operator to fire at him or at the communication
5.
Eating disorder helpline fires AI for harmful advice after sacking humans(nypost.com)
2 points by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago|0 comments
6.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
I would argue that we have already passed that point in several areas: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36139349 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36003595 https://news.ycombinator.com&#x2
7.
by IEnjoyTapNinja 3y ago
The main part of the policy seems to be the following: "We've reminded moderators that suspensions (and typically mod messages as well) are for real, verifiable malfeasance only, and should not be enacted on the basis of hunches,