Hizonner

47 ms·

781.
by Hizonner 2y ago
I'm a bit lost in all this, except for kind of thinking that it shows X86 is a giant mess. First, doesn't Windows knows how to use NVME drives as NVME drives , without going through some weird SATA compatibility layer? Second, i
782.
by Hizonner 2y ago
Don't waste time on looking at it unless a formal proof checker can verify it.
783.
by Hizonner 2y ago
Um, I back up EVERYTHING, like any sane person? And, like any other sane person, I self-host (on a server that's obviously backed up), and keep at least one copy of my email on my main working computer (which is also obviously backed u
784.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> By that logic any OSHW project using integrated circuits is closed-source. There are degrees to things. It's not cool to try to claim the prestige of "open source" when the entire board is nothing but a vehicle for your
785.
by Hizonner 2y ago
It's only open source before you populate it. After that it has a ton of closed-source chips on it. Including the ARM CPU that's the whole point of it existing in the first place.
786.
by Hizonner 2y ago
It'd be more terrifying if it didn't hallucinate earrings on somebody whose ears are out of frame , make comments about the left shoe of a barefoot child being out of focus, and so forth...
787.
by Hizonner 2y ago
If you work on "social robotics", just remember that this one of the least concerning of the corporate abuses that will arise from your work. There is no ethical way to build robots to which humans are meant to, or predictably
788.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> If proven, this should be harshly punishable under existing aiding and abetting laws. Convenient how the elements of the offenses in the "existing laws" are such that it's trivial for any non-idiot to structure things so
789.
by Hizonner 2y ago
The Python community appears hostile to thinking ahead; designing stable, durable APIs; and sticking with them. It's gotten to the point where you're lucky if you can solve the dependencies for a single version of a single program
790.
by Hizonner 2y ago
Until they ban VPNs. Moral panics acknowledge no bounds of sanity.
791.
by Hizonner 2y ago
Nice of you to volunteer others as experimental subjects.
792.
by Hizonner 2y ago
AKA stupid paranoia.
793.
by Hizonner 2y ago
... and 100 percent of long posts on LinkedIn are useless drivel from idiots engaged in clumsy self-promotion. So?
794.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> They communicated with each other on highly secure phones You keep using that word...
795.
by Hizonner 2y ago
I used that package once, to write a program to do US taxes on Canadian mutual funds. Yes, it seemed necessary.
796.
by Hizonner 2y ago
Joined a site. Posted something obviously intended to piss people off, for no reason other than pissing people off. Got banned. I'm shocked.
797.
by Hizonner 2y ago
What a moist data center might look like: https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5uvvnrHCuRmzZzyLZUQXNU-970... Actually seems like a hardish target.
798.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> and call for nuking west The number one most noticeable English mistake Russians tend to make is dropping articles all the time...
799.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> A headlight-leveling servo can last the lifetime of the vehicle. Not everything is a Chrysler. Everything can last the life of the vehicle. If you have 10,000 parts, each of which can last the life of the vehicle, there is epsilon
800.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> lights are smart, and include things like motors to level the headlights (so when the car is loaded with heavy luggage, the lights are turned to compensate), steering headlights to illuminate the corners, to automatically detect if the
801.
by Hizonner 2y ago
First of all, this isn't either of those. It's just plain old butter, labelled as such. Secondly, people in general also know what those are.
802.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> You might know, but does someone visiting your house know that? Well, yes, because 99 percent of people in general know that butter is made from milk, and that includes 100 percent of the people who might visit my house. And if I did s
803.
by Hizonner 2y ago
That's pretty much irrelevant to whether you know if butter contains butter.
804.
by Hizonner 2y ago
The part that's out of whack is the part where they tell consumers who have already bought the butter to throw it away. In order to have received that direction, you must have already seen the recall notice itself, which tells you the
805.
by Hizonner 2y ago
I don't think you're getting what I'm saying here. If an email provider is throwing away wanted messages from legitimate senders because of some "trust" metric, then it is that email provider's reponsibility,
806.
by Hizonner 2y ago
That ("Anthropic's" deliverability issue) is a Microsoft issue. Don't normalize Microsoft's bad practices.
807.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> Deleting them would have moved me down a tier. Presumably it would also have lost your record of the fact that they'd already asked to not get your email. So you'd have added them back to the spam list if they ever dealt with
808.
by Hizonner 2y ago
It has nothing to do with being an "expert on chronic diseases", and everything to do with not getting yourself formally diagnosed while you're applying for insurance .
809.
by Hizonner 2y ago
> Bill’s family had always thought it was a freak coincidence that his father and grandfather both had ALS. Bill's family isn't too bright. > An ALS specialist ordered Bill a DNA test. ... and Bill took it, which shows that
810.
by Hizonner 2y ago
That has basically zero practical effect. If Google hands out the weights to thousands of people, and even one of them leaks them to somebody who hasn't "seen a bunch of agreements", then Google's only protection again

More ›