HdS84

11 ms·

91.
by HdS84 3y ago
While true, domestic use is super problematic and balloons any bill. E.g. our house in germany is from 1968. We where lucky and the builder did not use any asbestos so I could do most renovations myself. If you have asbestos, you need speci
92.
by HdS84 3y ago
Thanks, that's fascinating. Ar least in my recollection, the expedit I knew was comparable to a Billy in wood density, but I might be mistaken - it's nearly twenty years. Funnily, the most sturdy piece of furniture we own is from
93.
by HdS84 3y ago
At least in Germany quality has gone downhill. I still own some Billies made in 1995 or so by Ikea. Literally massive wood and damn good book shelves. The ones bought by me in 2008 or so very noticeably less well build but still ok. The one
94.
by HdS84 3y ago
Ravendb has an interesting use case. It's basically as easy to use as mongo DB, similarly scalable and at the same time is acid, has a nicer query language and is more secure. Iike it actually more than SQL, especially for typical LOb
95.
by HdS84 3y ago
I've used ravemsb 3 and did not observe auch problems. If I remember correctly, sent was replaced around ravemsb 2 and licence is now optional
96.
by HdS84 3y ago
I just wish that Linux would be less obnoxious about file separators and especially line endings. Windows mostly just eats linux-style line endings and file paths without a problem, and MOST programs do not have a problem either. Feed a win
97.
by HdS84 3y ago
I was just on a such a project. Output was via custom binary format send through BT. Commands where generated through a wpf app. The code did not follow separation of concerns or MVVM at all. Just trying to disentangle Bluetooth from wpf wa
98.
by HdS84 3y ago
It's very useful for multiple scenarios: 1. Learning new syntax. E.g. the new switch expressions are pretty neat and better than the old switch statements. Changing and learning how to write them is super easy thanks to this feature. 2
99.
by HdS84 3y ago
Content negotiation is useful when there are multiple feasible return formats. But when is that the case? For data, Json is the absolute king. For content, html is king. There is very little to negotiate. The only case where I needed that f
100.
by HdS84 3y ago
Do you know ravendb? Document db almost entirely written in c#. It's incredible how fast it can get, but as you said it does not look like typical lob code at all
101.
by HdS84 3y ago
Wix is part of the problem. It's basically making money for the developers who offer consultancy for it. Therefore the documentation is poor , like the absolute worst I've ever seen. Opening issues for doc issues never results in
102.
by HdS84 3y ago
One Major Point for monorepos is the ability to eschew packages. In most languages creating, publishing and consuming a package is a lot of work, while in a monorepo you just add a reference to the code and are ready to go (except in react
103.
by HdS84 3y ago
And that could not be handled by making an optional namespace which can be used when it is actually needed? Even without namespaces, it's trivial to handle { "NamespaceA": {....}, "NamespaceB": {....}, } There is se
104.
by HdS84 3y ago
Quite possibly. We would need to look through a few OSs projects to determine what's a common style.
105.
by HdS84 3y ago
Yeah, culture is a big one. See dotnet vs java. The latter picked up many of c# feature over the years but is still much more verbose, e.g. because their developers still abhor var
106.
by HdS84 3y ago
XML suffers from too many options and useless bells and whistles. E.g. the attribute vs Parameter topic is a source of confusion, without adding much value, especially if the source and target are object oriented and/ or a relational d
107.
by HdS84 3y ago
It's so so. Pythons core value is it's huge stack of lib's. And most important fall down with IP due to them using c and so on. When we needed python c# interop it was better to use python.net and integrate that way. Annoying
108.
by HdS84 3y ago
German here. You can absolutely remediate heavily polluted rivers. Best example might be the Rhine. It was so toxic in the 70s that everything in it died. Now it's a nice river with lots of living things and you can absolutely swim in
109.
by HdS84 3y ago
I like fire Fighting jobs, you always see some new insanity.
110.
by HdS84 3y ago
At least for python and dotnet, I think github actions are superior. Gitlab did not support poetry for ages there where bugs with python galore and for dotnet they do not speak the same language - e.g. issues in dotnet are reported as saeif
111.
by HdS84 3y ago
I get that gitlab needs more features to continue to sell. But honestly for me it reduces the attractiveness of gitlab. Just adding half working features does not increase the value for me. Please finish and polish the existing Features bef
112.
by HdS84 3y ago
I honestly do not get what's your problem. We moved from 4.8 to 7 because a) the better compiler warnings helped to reduce the amount of shit people where able to check-in AND highlight problems in the existing codebase (beyond "w
113.
by HdS84 3y ago
I did not encounter this before also. But this crowd believed it obviously. The chief perpetrators already left when I got there, so I could not ask directly. Zero tests, zero documentation and a coding style like somebody tried to write pu
114.
by HdS84 3y ago
Types replace some tests and introduce a lot of ceremony. If this a worthwhile tradeoff depends. E.g. I wrote c# and Python for a living. Especially in the mid 2010s python was much better for the Microservices I wrote because they are so s
115.
by HdS84 3y ago
I am currently firefighting for a customer who has a medium Sized application in c#. Started around 2019 so not ancient, but every programming, architecture and technology choice was wrong. Sure it compiles. But often it crashes without rhy
116.
by HdS84 3y ago
Sorry, I literally forgot them. A lookup here refreshed my memory: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref...
117.
by HdS84 3y ago
I really wish to like F# but the line noise kills me every time. I would kill for a "visual basic" f# where the absurd terseness is replaced with a little less noise. E.g. instead of seq use sequence, instead of abstract one lette
118.
by HdS84 4y ago
I really like FP, but I think most FP language designers are a little too enamored with cryptic symbols and abbreviations. Tried f# but the abbreviations turned me off, e.g. seq instead of sequence.
119.
by HdS84 4y ago
And? Even if so, you should be unable to gain anything from that. As a developer, I am annoyed that we remove so much valuable info from exceptions. It would be better to include more info and then make it easier to dump this information in
120.
by HdS84 4y ago
Gitlab registry is utterly annoying with it's confusing namespacing. Would use github oder anything else tbh.

More ›