4 ms·
I get that gitlab needs more features to continue to sell. But honestly for me it reduces the attractiveness of gitlab. Just adding half working features does
by HdS84 3y ago
I get that gitlab needs more features to continue to sell.
But honestly for me it reduces the attractiveness of gitlab. Just adding half working features does not increase the value for me.
Please finish and polish the existing Features before adding hype feature 93939. Maybe add a policy that your open feature and big count should be less than 20K or something.
Examples:
Security scanning has a god awful UI and UX.
The whole project management stuff is barely usable
Pipelines have loads of weird half features and missing QOL. E
G. Adding saeif support instead of just your own warnings format.
- lvncelot 3y agoIt's honestly doubly annoying when there's multiple times per month where I run into some issue / straight up bug which I then find an ongoing bug ticket from like 2018 for, that's still open but apparently not being worked on. I really like Gitlab, I think the CI experience is a lot better than, for instance, Github Actions, but I also don't ever see me using a good chunk of the stuff that's been shoveled on in the last few years and I don't really know anyone that does.
- HdS84 3y agoAt least for python and dotnet, I think github actions are superior. Gitlab did not support poetry for ages there where bugs with python galore and for dotnet they do not speak the same language - e.g. issues in dotnet are reported as saeif, but gl has it own weird format. And yes, you are totally right with the bug tracker. It's often funny how long the ticket is just because it was retagged sooo many times.