Hauntingjackal

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Hauntingjackal 5y ago

   Thanks! I can definitely see the merit of the cartel argument. Also good point about putting down injured animals. (I still think gun regulation is a good thing, with some background checks to reduce the chances of people with e.g. psychosi
2. 2.▲
   by Hauntingjackal 5y ago

   I don't understand most of your comment (English is my fourth language). I don't understand "coming into this pretty hot" and "fast-forwarded a few exchanges". I also don't understand the part about empath
3. 3.▲
   by Hauntingjackal 5y ago

   Their point is probably that improving the reception in your location is a political rather than technical issue. I.e. it can be solved.
4. 4.▲
   by Hauntingjackal 5y ago

   Another possibility too is that your pings don't experience any packet losses, whereas actual data does which would increase the real latency. In short, there are many potential differences between ping and actual latency.
5. 5.▲
   by Hauntingjackal 5y ago

   Where do your clients live to need guns for protection? I presume it's for wildlife? What kind of wildlife poses that kind of threat? I know it's mandatory to carry firearms outside of settlements on Svalbard for polar bear protec