Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
HarrietTubgirl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
10y ago
CONGRATULATIONS
2.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
I've come and gone with various vim config changes, but this is the one non-standard one I've stuck with: au! BufRead,BufNewFile * lcd %:p:h This makes it so that when you open a buffer, you cd to the current directory (only for that window
3.
▲
List of fallacies
(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
I don't see how this has anything to do with misogyny? Perhaps you mean something else, like stereotyping.
5.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
You're not going to change this. Yes, virtually every great programmer or computer scientist is a male. So much so that we're all going to assume they're male, and when we see a female name (like "Leslie Lamport") we double-check to see if
6.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
This is an awesome article. Here's an example of the usual non-explanation: http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/everyday-tech/question1... This is how it was always explained to me. Yes, neutral and ground are the same thing. Why can't y
7.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
14y ago
An interesting article, but built on the assumption that until a certain age you won't have any exposure to software engineering which wasn't true even in 2000. As a middle-schooler my programming ability was ahead of my math ability and I
8.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
I'll start out with the classic: "Introduction to Algorithms" a.k.a. "CLRS" http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Algorithms-Thomas-H-Corme... I think this is all (and probably more than) you really "need" if you want to know CS for programm
9.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
Neat idea, although to be fair the examples are straw men. I think most people would indent their LISP much more readably.
10.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
1) If you're going to build out an open office, make sure to invest in sound engineering to dampen noise. There is a big difference between hearing distractions in the immediate vicinity and hearing them across the entire office. 2) Then ma
11.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
Sure, but here are some prejudices people will have about you going into an interview: - You don't want to work enough (~80hr/weeks). - You aren't familiar with new technologies or languages, and aren't curious enough to learn. - You think
12.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
"In their right mind" or "reasonable" is not what "rational" means in discussions of economics. There also isn't as much of an implication of rational=good and irrational=bad.
13.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
Here's the main thing that fucks this all up: there are a very limited set of brainteasers out there. This means that if someone gets your brainteaser right in an interview, there's, say, a 90% chance that they've heard a question just like
14.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
I interned at Google back in the day, and when I came back to school, I can only remember raving about one thing -- the food. It was absolutely fucking amazing. I gained 10 pounds that summer (starting at 145, this probably wasn't a bad thi
15.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
Thankfully we're nowhere near where intelligence itself is being displaced, only small subsets of work that were previously the domain of highly specialized experts [sidenote: Mathematica has been doing this for a while]. Nor will advances
16.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
If it's new and you are pushing its boundaries, you will get screwed. Always. This goes for new major releases of MySQL just as well as MongoDB.
17.
▲
by
HarrietTubgirl
15y ago
Oof, it's hard to draw conclusions from this. - The stuff the subjects are doing bears only a passing resemblance to the work that most of us have to do. - Surfing the web is probably what those students are doing for breaks in work anyway