HardlyCognizant

4 ms·

1.
by HardlyCognizant 2mo ago
Nothing can save everyone, that's the point. There is no miracle out there that suddenly makes the world a fairy tale. And I don't have an answer, otherwise I would have made a claim to that effect. This is a hard problem, and t
2.
by HardlyCognizant 2mo ago
> why are we building all of this? To remove humans from power in all cases where our biases and animalistic nature would cause unnecessary suffering to others. As a species we are quickly approaching some very hard problems that no ind
3.
by HardlyCognizant 3mo ago
I always assumed the American version was using "could" ironically. Now I'm wonder if is an unintentional neologism.
4.
by HardlyCognizant 3mo ago
Do they roll their own software, or is it a purchased solution? I'd love to know more about the application powering it.
5.
Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale: Development, Validation, and Outcomes(sciencedirect.com)
4 points by HardlyCognizant 4mo ago|0 comments
6.
by HardlyCognizant 4mo ago
Poison pilling skills is a thing, though finding evidence for it is difficult given the crux is an absence of information. The baseline instruction and training is given to the model by the expert, but edge cases are willfully neglected.
7.
by HardlyCognizant 4mo ago
I'd imagine you have to read for a particular framework to assess viability. Translating from a literary medium to a visual one is very challenging. Much of the detail in the former will be lost in the latter, like inner monologue, n
8.
by HardlyCognizant 5mo ago
It's the prisoner's dilemma. I believe any self-preservation optimized intelligence is going to suffer from these problems until those behaviors are countered in interaction by design (e.g. process, societal/cultural pressur
9.
by HardlyCognizant 5mo ago
That just means the forms of lobbying being permitted are antithetical to democracy, and is just bribery in a different form. The problem is with the lobbying, not the accountability.
10.
by HardlyCognizant 6mo ago
No, you are using it ironically. The connotation of a word is entirely contextual.
11.
by HardlyCognizant 3y ago
Not even gluten, one of the peptides it is composed of. Prolamins like gliadin, horadin, etc. depending on the grain. This is why gluten denaturing proteases aren't sufficient to protect a celiac, and thus some technically GF foods a
12.
by HardlyCognizant 3y ago
I feel the greatest difference is that in science, you are to assume the negative. You are to prove yourself wrong, not right. Being right is a matter of accomplishment by exclusion. It is the pursuit of facts/truth, but with the un
13.
by HardlyCognizant 3y ago
They are liable and there is precedent, as I understand it. eBay v Newmark https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/3472 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/basr.12108
14.
by HardlyCognizant 3y ago
As I understand it C2 (command and control) is technically separate, and traditionally resembles Theory X , though current thinking seems to have aspirations towards Theory Y for various roles and scenarios in Mission Command.
15.
by HardlyCognizant 4y ago
Others have have covered most of these, but I'll chime in to agree: 1. Break down required activities into emotionally manageable tasks. (Sometimes this necessitates rendering it down to a level where it seems trivial.) 2. Cut deals w
16.
by HardlyCognizant 4y ago
Unfortunately, with the advent of things like Badge Engineering, brand has now become a prisoner's dilemma problem. Eventually, the brand will sell out and people will fall victim to the switch. There are obviously exceptions, but it