H8crilA

46 ms·

661.
by H8crilA 3y ago
No, it will completely eliminate it, if the capacitor is large enough. If you're super paranoid you can do the maths and compute how much does it cut off at such frequency ranges. It's likely to be a ridiculous value. And one does
662.
by H8crilA 3y ago
> Only very unusual phrases need to be corrected, often there are no such cases.
663.
by H8crilA 3y ago
This makes parsing and rendering easier, but writing harder. Given the widespread adoption of Markdown I suspect this project to go absolutely nowhere, since it focuses on precisely the opposite thing that makes Markdown popular.
664.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I mean I actually watch Russian propaganda, as well as various other propaganda sources. It's rather clear what they're doing, and fully consistent with citizen behavior. Remember how just a few days ago Wagner took control of a 1
665.
by H8crilA 3y ago
No, but Pioruns are also attached to cars and lightly armored vehicles. It's not that difficult to do :) The real answer is that the Stinger needs a long overdue modernisation.
666.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Sorry, I meant do technology transfer. Obviously manufacturing must be (also, or even primarily) in the US.
667.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Just import the PPZR Piorun instead. It is much more modern and more effective than the Stinger, for example with much better flare evasion. Stinger is from the 70s.
668.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Today's Russian propaganda is entirely different from Soviet propaganda. It creates a depoliticized society by generating as many incompatible statements as they can and blasting that from every tube. This is a lot more advanced than w
669.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Yes.
670.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I don't know anything about him actually. People who know a lot about Russia never even mention his name, and I only heard rather stupid headlines associated with his name. So I won't bother spending time on this guy. There are ac
671.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I mean the Soviet Union has been an expansionary empire from the start. It is a fact, as well as a convenient PR/propaganda point. First stopped by Poland and West Ukraine in 1921, then deterred by Poland for about two decades. Next st
672.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Yep, or simply add "GET " in front of it. Best add it in front of all packets.
673.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Yeah, in "prime locations", I know that. But I know it because of other sources, and to some extent despite Blind. There's just too much rumor there written with full confidence.
674.
by H8crilA 3y ago
The problem with Blind is that it gathers mostly obsessive people with short attention spans, and those obsessions cause a lot of exaggeration or straight up bullshittery. It's like reading "leaks from people working at intelligen
675.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Bombing a city can result in tens to hundreds of thousands of casualties.
676.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I would disagree. The leading organization is much more aligned with the needs of the nation than the likes of Iran or Russia, which probably wouldn't mind bombing the shit out of their own city if it was necessary to stay in power. Fo
677.
by H8crilA 3y ago
They are tapped into SSL certificates, those that are generated in China. Plus wherever the Chinese intelligence managed to install their "plugins".
678.
by H8crilA 3y ago
1 - I believe they do it 2 - they obviously do not want to block all traffic, since they can do it any day, but they don't.
679.
by H8crilA 3y ago
It's extremely intuitive. You're trying to filter unusual, encrypted traffic. First rule exploits the IND-CPA property of most encryption. You want to kill traffic that has about 4 bits set to 1 per byte, i.e. traffic that "l
680.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Lol you guys never worked with real data :D There's at least 1'000 such algorithms at each google-like company.
681.
by H8crilA 3y ago
The exact reverse engineered algorithm of the GFW is on page 4. It looks very reasonable (given what they are trying to achieve with it). The easiest bypass I can think of would be to tunnel your connections via TLS. For example socks serve
682.
by H8crilA 3y ago
It was probably written by junior devs, like most other software around the world.
683.
by H8crilA 3y ago
? I don't understand your point. Do you think it makes any difference whether I use my laptop, or a pen, or ChatGPT to violate copyright?
684.
by H8crilA 3y ago
> You have a different set of rights than ChatGPT. Gods, no. Where did you get that from?
685.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I wonder if it works like the ESG scores, where an oil company can score max results because it is ranked against peers, i.e. other oil companies.
686.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Copyright just doesn't protect such cases. There's a funny exaggeration that is very illustrative: copyright protects the bugs in the code. I.e. the specific way in which code was written. Reading it and getting inspired was never
687.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I mean in the floating point / quantized numbers and the connections that make the model? I'm not sure I follow, the analogy to the human brain has always been obvious, it's even in the name (artificial neural network) ...
688.
by H8crilA 3y ago
No, even with i one of the solutions is \tau = 0
689.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Do you allow commercial employees to read the code and incorporate knowledge obtained from the code into their brains?
690.
by H8crilA 3y ago
Well, I can say π := 3π, and -1 still works. The point is exp() is that 2π*i periodic.

More ›