Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Gwypaas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
271.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Ehhhh..... Naive? My point was hypotheticals that Russia would like to achieve disconnected from the physical terminals. This is the first result when searching for it. > But Musk says it's been a difficult environment. "Star
272.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Of course, they are? If Russia can hack SpaceX's systems and divert them to ensure they do not provide service over Ukraine, why wouldn't they? Or brick all terminals by sending a malicious update? Similarly, dealing with electrom
273.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
The expensive part is not the terminals, it is providing continuous reliable service in a hostile environment with a determined adversary.
274.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
"The server returned an unexpected error." Now GLHF!
275.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
You will not get insurance to operate your ship in a warzone either way. That was the problem with for example the Ukrainian grain export. So on that question, no, not more than any other system on board. A hardened navigation system does n
276.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
The professional side has just about migrated to ECDIS. [1] Certified electronic charts with extra screens and independent power backups to make it as safe as regular paper charts in emergencies. Almost all new ships on international voyage
277.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Which regulations should we remove then if it is that easy? We tried to solve the climate crisis with nuclear energy 15-20 years ago. It was the right thing to do at the time but it did not work out, instead renewables have exceeded all p
278.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
> LCOE is unrelated to systems costs. Yeah, imagine how great it will be when we can dimension the electricity grid for the average consumption rather than peak due to distributed generation and storage.
279.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
So it is impossible until it is possible? Gotta prove it physically instead of engineering a system that is known to work. > Also the world is about 82% fossil and biofuel. Primary energy usage, so an utterly irrelevant metric. With a co
280.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
I do not get where you think that need of a fossil grid comes from? Seems like a hyperbole based on preconceived notions? Research has consistently shown that a 100% renewable grid is feasible and economically sound. > Much of the resist
281.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Given the outcome of Flamanville 3, Olkiluoto 3, Hinkley Point C, Vogtle, Virgil C. Summer and NuScale that predictability leans heavily towards renewables. They get built on time and within budget. https://en.wikipedia.org/
282.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
The great thing today is that fossil and biofuels are not alternatives today. It is renewables. So no point arguing a straw man.
283.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Again, the market does not exist anymore. That is the point you are missing. The British taxpayers are set to lose ~£50 billion in subsidies to Hinkley Point C because the government decided they needed a nuclear industry. [1] There is no m
284.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Usually electricity transmission is funded by taxes since that is centralized infrastructure. Production is often a commercial endeavor where energy is trade by the hour, or through longer contracts, on open markets. This depends on the c
285.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
You are missing the forest for the trees in your blind defense of everything nuclear. There is no problem with the fact that the civilian nuclear programs came from the military ones. The point is that we have come full circle. For a nation
286.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Because nuclear is enormously expensive and has always been subsidized by taxes or ratepayers. Subsidizing nuclear made sense when we were in the first R&D and commercialization phase 60 years ago. The idea to keep shoveling money into
287.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
The latest floating off-shore wind pilot project in UK went for £87.30/MWh = $105US/MWh. This is a super low scale project so if it works out we can expect costs to reduce quite drastically when scaling it up. https://a
288.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
It is all about creating the industrial base with people going through university specializing in it. In 2017 this angle was up in the news in the UK. Take the responses as you like. > The government is using the “extremely expensive” Hi
289.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Not really. Even if you assume crazy high energy prices in the future you get a larger return on your investment using cheaper technology. https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-...
290.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-...
291.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Rust has amazing integration with Python through PyO3 [1] so see it like a safe alternative for high performance calculations and operations. The rust data science ecosystem itself is starting to come together with projects like Polars [2]
292.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
I have never found this to be the case as long as you are using workspaces to split up the compilation units.
293.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
For square riggers the problem is rather tacking, because then you're backing the entire sail area and putting strain in the wrong direction for the rigging. The rigging is built to withstand immense pressure from behind and the side,
294.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Amazing ship, been laid up in Mystic Seaport for the last couple of years after crossing from Norway to the US through Iceland and Greenland. From what I have understood talking with people involved the billionaire builder got bored with th
295.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Because they are not keeping your money/stocks/tokens/whatever like they promised and should. Like all real brokers do. A bank run can not happen for a broker. It is like Vanguard sending your money to their hypothetical Chin
296.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Then use an escrow. > An escrow is a contractual arrangement in which a third party (the stakeholder or escrow agent) receives and disburses money or property for the primary transacting parties, with the disbursement dependent on condit
297.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Great that it's windier closer to the poles and windier during the winter. Unless you're talking about north of the arctic circle, then sure. You can fill that niche of a couple of hundred thousand people living in the global nort
298.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
The windiest places on earth are near the poles, and it is windier during the winter than summer. https://globalwindatlas.info/en
299.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
More dogmatic thinking. "If it's not perfect for my Alaskan hut north of the Arctic circle then......" If you care about land use and is not using it to simply sow discontent mandate solar above parking. The US is a complete
300.
▲
by
Gwypaas
4y ago
Given your answers, I suspect you have a quite dogmatic view of the world, but we can nonetheless look into research and other sources. > Much of the resistance towards 100% Renewable Energy (RE) systems in the literature seems to come f
More ›