Guvante

32 ms·

601.
by Guvante 3y ago
I think git gets a bad rep because no one can agree how to use it. GitHub PRs vs pushing a branch, rebase vs merge are just two examples of tools that do identical things in fundamentally different ways. And the problem is none of them are
602.
by Guvante 3y ago
I suspect it is mostly who supports build machines desktop support or network support.
603.
by Guvante 3y ago
AI is fundamentally about redistributing the content it trains on.
604.
by Guvante 3y ago
Linguist oddity. Sweets is never used to refer to a drink in the US so your statements about "the war on sugar" appeared to apply to non-drinks. If talking about non-drinks a tax on sugar in drinks is always not the answer. I didn
605.
by Guvante 3y ago
It is just a caching bug. You shouldn't need to recompile the runtime to statically link it. Red might not have a way to store intermediate static linking files and so is forced to do a full compilation everytime. Caching at the output
606.
by Guvante 3y ago
Doom was claimed then and Reddit said "we aren't pulling a Twitter" and waited until the last minute to pull a Twitter. Costs matter a lot and not having any made the first post hard to understand.
607.
by Guvante 3y ago
You didn't quote any numbers so I looked them up for you. The first hit of "why do snacks taste different" would have answered your idea about snacks tasting bad. (While blaming a tax on sugary soda) Your post was ranting abo
608.
by Guvante 3y ago
> doing your own research Reading online articles is not doing your own research > Even if you are a practicing scientist you won't even get a chance to be heard because the science is settled and wrong think is dangerous! This i
609.
by Guvante 3y ago
The author didn't say "early Twitter" they said Twitter. They claimed you don't need more than one Engineer to run a product like Twitter in their post so I said they should try.
610.
by Guvante 3y ago
Why are you ignoring other changes in ingredients in your story? Tons of well liked foods got bought out by mega corporations who then penny pinched the ingredient list to the point that while visually similar the taste was no where near as
611.
by Guvante 3y ago
I mean feel free to make the next Twitter with a single Engineer if you think it is possible.
612.
by Guvante 3y ago
Science is all about being critical. You just need proof to back up your different idea.
613.
by Guvante 3y ago
Incorrect. Reddit announced a new pricing model without details on that date. https://www.reddit.com/r/apolloapp/comments/13ws4w3/had_a_ca... Can't figure out to get an exact date on mobile but Apr
614.
by Guvante 3y ago
Those things require action in hours or days not months. An app ban doesn't need to happen on that kind of timescale. If it is that important legislation can be passed on the several months timescale that takes. Our Constitution doesn&
615.
by Guvante 3y ago
Have you read the terms of service? Any rights that they are allowed to strip from you are gone as part of the ToS. Unless there is a law saying what you said explicitly, then 100% for certain Meta gives themselves permission to do it when
616.
by Guvante 3y ago
Your understanding is flawed. Copyright is 100% okay with transitively controlling production of content. After all how else would you describe someone allowing Netflix to stream your content? You can't restream Netflix and Netflix is
617.
by Guvante 3y ago
There is no sematic difference between passing in a reference and passing in a copy of a smart pointers though. Yes there is a difference at the call site between taking a reference to an owned thing and taking potential ownership of the th
618.
by Guvante 3y ago
It also doesn't help that making a profit is hard especially from user driven content which advertisers are uncertain about. You can try making your platform advertiser friendly but stuff that isn't advertising friendly tends to b
619.
by Guvante 3y ago
You need some form of moderation. In the real world we interact with few enough people that we just ignore and don't be around people who don't contribute to the conversation. The internet doesn't allow this, you are talking
620.
by Guvante 3y ago
You can sell or give away the right to develop the land. Similar to HoAs you can restrict the usage of your land and as long as someone else holds the keys to unlocking that usage it will survive bankruptcy. The title would retain the restr
621.
by Guvante 3y ago
Feel free to point to a single example of restricting the right to vote in a Democratic society improving that society. Hell I would love to hear an example of such a restriction that wasn't beneficial to a particular part of society.
622.
by Guvante 3y ago
So there is a large supply of high density housing? If housing prices are going up and higher density housing isn't going up then you have regulation blocking it. After all if people are willing to pay a $2,000 mortgage for a home you
623.
by Guvante 3y ago
The US was founded on fighting back against being forced to act by others. Why would making subsets of the population work and rent but not allow them a voice improve anything? Everything you suggested would result in the current problems g
624.
by Guvante 3y ago
Only in instances of fraud, at least effectively. Appraisals defer heavily to "this person is willing to pay $X to this unrelated person for this exact house". If they can find someone paying more for a nicer house and someone pay
625.
by Guvante 3y ago
Have you read into that situation? The Sackler family got the bankruptcy judge to give them and all of their companies personal immunity from a situation because the corporation was going bankrupt. Why can a bankruptcy proceeding for one en
626.
by Guvante 3y ago
Microbenchmarks are hard. You aren't doing any meaningful work that could benefit from speculatively executing instead of stalling for the conditional value. Similarly you might be busting the pipeline by chaining together the jumps so
627.
by Guvante 4y ago
For better or worse in the current age of the internet prose is a good first pass filter for quality. Someone arguing incoherently is seen as less believable. Unfortunately the prose for these chat models doesn't change based on how ce
628.
by Guvante 4y ago
It isn't surprising given this rhetoric was created by AI art producers to avoid having to pay for their training sets.
629.
by Guvante 4y ago
100,000 / 5 = 20,000 off the numbers given here. Don't quote the 2 GB one that one is disingenuous. That is like copying the dictionary heap sorting by word frequency leaving only the most popular words and saying "see I coul
630.
by Guvante 4y ago
Napster thought so too

More ›