Guvante

26 ms·

421.
by Guvante 3y ago
It can be superior and not valuable to customers. People who don't have an existing build system don't have money. People who have an existing build system would need to migrate which can be super painful. And nothing in the artic
422.
by Guvante 3y ago
Certainly headsets could use the tech but the difficulties in using it for monitors are enormous. Also the performance benefits aren't as enormous as you would think. For instance unless you are pixel bound (which to be fair most thing
423.
by Guvante 3y ago
Did you change your router settings? It should all heal up with a simple broadcast packet. It could be your router defaults to blocking broadcast packets related to wireless devices. (Either in or out)
424.
by Guvante 3y ago
To be fair VB.net originally had dynamic capabilities that C# lacked so at least it possessed features that made its existence justifiable. However the extreme changes required to go from VB6 -> VB.net made it all kind of moot, might as
425.
by Guvante 3y ago
They eventually added optional names parameters which made the interop problem much better for C# compared to VB. C# wasn't as good still but you no longer had to put earlier params at their default value (which is what made it unusabl
426.
by Guvante 3y ago
Yeah, as someone who worked somewhere that had a VB6 project: VB.net was only at all useful as a stop gap between VB and C# and a barely useful one at that. The language as it stands is fine and interop with .NET means it is a decent choice
427.
by Guvante 3y ago
Minimum specs shouldn't be 4k@60Hz. 1080p is fine for min spec. 120Hz is more than twice as hard of a performance number to hit compared to 60Hz.
428.
by Guvante 3y ago
You are mixing many different viewpoints here and it is diluting whatever point you were making. Harassment has a legal definition and so a law referring to it is not "as described by social media users"... You then decide by fiat
429.
by Guvante 3y ago
That isn't Twitter/X's argument though. Their argument is producing the document is forced speech. That argument is not aligned with any precedent. The government absolutely has the right to compel you to talk about your inte
430.
by Guvante 3y ago
How they act is the hyper focus on first to market. HFT wants to have the first buy or sell order at price X. Being first to market does not impact liquidity availability. After all someone else has an order at that price already. My points
431.
by Guvante 3y ago
My estimate is 70% is peripheral and the eye can move across the screen in 105ms or so. (60° FOV 18° excluding peripheral and 400°/sec speed) That makes things really hard when your absolute minimum input latency (that nobody gets in p
432.
by Guvante 3y ago
4k@60Hz is fine as long as you have FreeSync or G-Sync IMHO. (Assuming you are actually hovering around 60 FPS) GPU vendors keep pushing new pretty tech that their cards can't quite keep up with and even a 18ms frame time means 30 Hz w
433.
by Guvante 3y ago
What risk are they taking exactly? Bugs ruining the business isn't meaningful risk for the customer. It isn't like day traders are at risk of going bankrupt due to that after all. They claim liquidity is their value but given how
434.
by Guvante 3y ago
Yes mistakes were made. The mask kerfuffle was a black eye on the CDC 100%. But calling it overall insane and pretending everyone was ignorant at the time only makes sense if you are ignoring everything that wasn't eventually confirmed
435.
by Guvante 3y ago
I don't mean dox yourself. I mean if that was happening on a reasonable scale then there would be stories about it. There were many stories about disagreements. There were stories about subtle disagreements leading to bans. I am just s
436.
by Guvante 3y ago
Hong Kong is lead by China directly which is why I phrased it as I did. Secession would have been before China took direct control. At this point any "secession" wouldn't come from the government.
437.
by Guvante 3y ago
Russia does not get to veto NATO membership, they are not at the table. Saying if NATO just ignored Ukraine then Russia wouldn't have invaded us ridiculous. The entire reason Russia pushed to exclude Ukraine was to allow invasion. Othe
438.
by Guvante 3y ago
IIRC the story wasn't as told. Specifically while peace talks were possible the West reminded Ukraine before they began they needed to make clear that there were certain uncompromising demands. In particular Russia had to leave Ukraine
439.
by Guvante 3y ago
People weren't deplatformed for saying masks helped.
440.
by Guvante 3y ago
They weren't prevented from saying wrong things or even penalized for lying. They were deplatformed. You don't have a first amendment right to use platforms as you like and those platforms have the same first amendment right you d
441.
by Guvante 3y ago
There are plenty of wealthy frugal people, they just don't get talked about much since they aren't as exciting. Also often people who have tons of wealth start divesting it once they realize they have too much. And again a "c
442.
by Guvante 3y ago
"Human drivers kill a lot of people" is true "AI will probably kill fewer people" is true but probably is doing a lot of work when you turn that into "no reason to slow down AI full speed ahead". In fact that i
443.
by Guvante 3y ago
At the time we worry less and give deference to the government. Sue later if they screwed up. Exactly what is going on is what you want, you don't need to add "they shouldn't have done anything in the first place" as if
444.
by Guvante 3y ago
Given your phrasing of "Coronavirus is political" my guess is the aerosol anecdote isn't the whole story. Feel free to give actual examples as I said originally.
445.
by Guvante 3y ago
> Unfortunately, I don't think that lets NATO, etc., off the hook, as you are morally responsible for the predictable consequences of your actions, even if a predictable consequence is an immoral act from another party, but that is
446.
by Guvante 3y ago
To my knowledge there has never been an "accepted legal method" and so while I agree with your point I don't know your summary is better...
447.
by Guvante 3y ago
We shouldn't allow the government to act quickly? That is nonsensical, going slower during a crisis makes zero sense. You can argue what boundaries should be relaxed and how far to relax them but "hold the government to a tighter
448.
by Guvante 3y ago
200k miles is what $1k in maintenance? I was listing it but it was a rounding error. I felt like 200k is also before major repairs for the types of vehicle you would want for this. If you had $9k repairs and $1k of maintenance it would be 0
449.
by Guvante 3y ago
COVID matters as we generally agree that during public health crisises it is reasonable for the government to overstep bounds a little to reduce loss of life. Objectively it is different. Additionally you are going to have a hard time justi
450.
by Guvante 3y ago
To be fair saying "there was election fraud" is disinformation at this point, we very carefully checked and the only real problems were people following Trump's advice and voting multiple times for him (on extremely small sca

More ›