Guthur

29 ms·

391.
by Guthur 4y ago
If everyone is so united in opposition why are they still buying the oil and gas (paying in Rubles)? If they're so together why did Turkey block Sweden and Finland joining Nato. If the unifying petrodollar still binds us all why is Sau
392.
by Guthur 4y ago
Quite sure the whole world is at similar inflation levels, pretty sure it's about 30% considering the drop in profits from Western retailers, same revenue, massive drop in profits, the retailers took the inflationary hit but it will be
393.
by Guthur 4y ago
Please, stop this moral high ground rhetorical hypocrisy of the highest order. The US has had no qualms about invading countries or applying sanctions that harm innocent people. There are no good guys. People will all do terrible things for
394.
by Guthur 4y ago
Really? can you quantify what that means, are they going hungry, short of fuel, is their currency collapsing, do they have rampant inflation? Or is just that people that got us in this mess are telling you that some how russians are sufferi
395.
by Guthur 4y ago
There is a major fuel shortage so you are just robbing peter to pay Paul. Also fertiliser will be the next problem, we won't be able to grow enough to cover the loss of Russian and Ukraine exports next year. And meat as a source of pro
396.
by Guthur 4y ago
Solar and wind are strategically untenable. I can harden, concentrate and layer my defenses around dense energy production facilities. I can also concentrate my remedial assets to bring them back online asap. With the solar in particular it
397.
by Guthur 4y ago
In my day we used to ask why people are so different online than in real life...
398.
by Guthur 4y ago
"made possible, at least for white men, by the middle-class security of the post-war period" Typical matriarchy, always men working as a secret cabal. How is it possible to take this stuff seriously with such unsubstantiated nonse
399.
by Guthur 4y ago
I don't ask anyone to change, but if you have a problem I should be under no obligation to help you. I may help you but I'm not obliged to pander to your needs.
400.
by Guthur 4y ago
Aren't we all different, pretty sure none of us are carbon copies of each other. And so a more correct non political statement would be collaboration can breed creativity.
401.
by Guthur 4y ago
As usual the message is, I don't want to change amd adapt, everyone else should.
402.
by Guthur 4y ago
Yeah, it must be satire, or maybe someone straight out of uni and still waiting for the reality check.
403.
by Guthur 4y ago
And if he's tall the comment might be high tower, or orange hair or big nose, big ears, bold, bad breath etc. Stop trying to sanitise the world, that's why no one can live in it.
404.
by Guthur 4y ago
Pretty sure this is just governments reverting copyright to it's original purpose which was to control the mass distribution of information they don't like. Governments are increasingly pushing anti human ideology and policies tha
405.
by Guthur 4y ago
I don't use Spotify at all so not sure your point. I've listen to google play, amazon music, random guy on YouTube, random busker on the street. I hazard that more people are making money from music than ever before, maybe not ma
406.
by Guthur 4y ago
Honestly i don't think extro intro is useful i believe that it's more verbal vs written communicators, read some Drucker for more info. But yet we'll just find that there is not one size fits all and what will be great for on
407.
by Guthur 4y ago
And yet the author uses figures to also generate a false dichotomy. Just because a gap in income might be wider does not mean everyone is worse off, it is not a zero sum game. There is now far more music variety available than ever before,
408.
by Guthur 5y ago
Then no one should have or is your chosen overlord so benevolent to never use it against their live stock?
409.
by Guthur 5y ago
May be more interested in the power than top speed. It's a very comfortable tractor.
410.
by Guthur 5y ago
Nope, as a language Go adds nothing and sometimes feels like it gives even less. Where Go has been a success is tooling. The tooling is pretty decent and helps a lot. But that could be added to pretty much any language ecosystem
411.
by Guthur 5y ago
You need a strong services based economy to support an aged population, this is not what russia has by a long shot. Russia has few choices to fix this in timeline they'd have to work with. Population demographics take a long time to so
412.
by Guthur 5y ago
This is not the reason. Pure and simply Russia needs people, its dying. Low birth rate, high death rate, little immigration to make up the short fall (who wants to move to Russia :)), and to top off a weak economy that will struggle to supp
413.
by Guthur 5y ago
And this is inflation illustrated. When they talk about inflation being a rise in prices they are talking bullshit it is simply that they created more fiat currency and so devalued what was there before, as perfectly illustrated. The import
414.
by Guthur 5y ago
This looks more like AST than something humans should write and read, and this is coming from someone that digs Lisp :)
415.
by Guthur 5y ago
Soon they'll have our entire lives modelled out for us. Know what we'll be useful for, optimise to give us exactly what we need and nothing more. What could possibly go wrong.
416.
by Guthur 5y ago
No, that's not what it says at all. It says there is a correlation between the number of broken windows and crime, that's not causation. Or were you making an attempt to illustrate the common misconception
417.
by Guthur 5y ago
I just don't get why everyone maintains JIT manufacturing is bad, it's one of the many reasons we can have such reasonably low cost goods, its efficient.
418.
by Guthur 5y ago
Well I mean CL is absolutely littered with pragmatism it came out of a standard committee after all. In many ways I'd argue clojure is far more opinionated, it's just an opinion that might more closely align with modern sensibilit
419.
by Guthur 5y ago
Completely wild speculation... I think there are a number of disenfranchised "close to the metal" programmers. C has stagnated and won't likely move much, C++(++++...) has reached bonkers level of complexity, D is... D who, a
420.
by Guthur 5y ago
It seems like a fouls errand for C++ to continue to try and add higher level abstractions while maintaining a zero overhead principle.

More ›