Grimm1

37 ms·

331.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I think if you think the people who handle pandemics are the same people who handle dieting I have a bridge to sell you.
332.
by Grimm1 6y ago
It's a mistake to enshrine these companies though. Break out their app store and android division and make them a utility, but don't make google a permanent part of our lives by making them a necessity. I don't want to live i
333.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Saying there's a chance of something happening doesn't mean you intend it to or are advocating for it though.
334.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I think this is sound advice. I still have some in, but I locked in gains such that if I lost anything still in I'd still be well up.
335.
by Grimm1 6y ago
You realize over 70m people in the US are obese right and another 100m are overweight? Known vulnerable groups include 170m people right there. I can't take your argument seriously.
336.
by Grimm1 6y ago
What I don't understand with people who reply like this is why bother taking the chance? My thought is that people have never experienced a severe respiratory illness before, while I have and because of that I'm appropriately leve
337.
by Grimm1 6y ago
"Chest X-rays of asymptomatic patients – those infected but without symptoms – exhibited a severe chest X-ray 70%-80% of the time, but those with COVID-19 symptoms had one every time, she also added." https://www.usatod
338.
by Grimm1 6y ago
They're back up at Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6j4r9/wher...
339.
by Grimm1 6y ago
It's clearly not if you read the rest of that sentence, that's my metric for it to be useful. My metric for it being good is much deeper. Which is why I questioned what you responded with. We are already at the point of useful and
340.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I think I love this person.
341.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Good thing I didn't say it would, I'm really not sure what you think I wrote.
342.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I don't know what you're arguing against but it sure isn't what I wrote. "Code generation only needs to generate code with n bugs where n is less than the number of bugs a human developer generates for it to have usefuln
343.
by Grimm1 6y ago
"That considered, I had a pretty strict qualifier in my above post which means the machine must perform better than the average human in the respective task and therefore I'd be more likely to die driving my own car than a machine
344.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I don't want to die when I crash my own car, and I already debug my own apps at 12am. If your argument is that things need to be perfect than my god you must never leave your home! I'd trust a machine to drive more accurately than
345.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I sure am, and if I can code gen 90% of the boiler plate away I'll do it happily. Besides attacking me, do you have any point you'd like to make?
346.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Code generation only needs to generate code with n bugs where n is less than the number of bugs a human developer generates for it to have usefulness, and maybe some other factor of severity where they are generally less severe than human d
347.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Personally, after now seeing this, I think it's going to solve a problem for us that we're going to run into in the medium term so that's pretty neat, but we are dealing with a lot of data and re-computing certain things from
348.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I had a bit of a derp here at first, I was like what, python already has a functional (as in working) standard lib, then I read the docs and was like ohhhhh that functional. I think python made some half measures in regards to functional pr
349.
Ask HN: How have some of you gone beyond programming?
1 points by Grimm1 6y ago|2 comments
350.
by Grimm1 6y ago
"All I said was that YouTube should be treated as a utility" Right I don't think you've understood the implications of being a utility in the US. In the US: "Public utilities commissions may grant public utilities c
351.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Considering the doubts already at the top of this thread and that I have a distinct memory, though I'll be damned if I can remember where I read it, that TSMC would generally not work with Intel because they prefer long term partners n
352.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Your solution means no real competition or innovation could take place in that space then. I know it was just a quick take but there's a lot of consequences to that route imo. There's also nothing saying that everyone always goes
353.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Thanks for this, I will definitely follow along there. Yeah if they can just check a few of those boxes I'm much more likely to at least try to more regularly work with Julia.
354.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I said something similar in another thread, but for me it doesn't have to be better than Python, as that is largely going to be subjective, the package ecosystem just has to grow and have some offering, at all, for the things that I do
355.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Sure, I don't really like Biden or any of our elected officials on the right or left.
356.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Probably? I don't really know anything about the field at all just seemed fun, I'm purely interested in this from an intellectual standpoint so competing isn't really my end goal just want to understand the systems.
357.
by Grimm1 6y ago
"Unlike what I did" care to clarify?
358.
by Grimm1 6y ago
I legitimately could not get passed the choice of syntax, module organization etc. I believe many people feel the same way. Verbosity is good imo, languages are read more than written and Erlang is too terse for me. I love Erlang conceptual
359.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Not really the underlying concepts again the VM and OTP stuff are pretty neat, but the fact that it's fairly esoteric when it comes to writing it imo. That may be a shallow opinion but it did keep me away from the language in a way Eli
360.
by Grimm1 6y ago
Sure, but this article called out Elixir in a most unflattering way too, two wrongs may not make a right but I don't see the point of this post to do anything other than what I did right there state an opinion that is going to rustle s

More ›