Godhelpworld

4 ms·

1.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
Until now! They are now competing with cheap labor/intelligence from India and China. And Later worse with machine intelligence! Frankly the inly "skill" that you could rely on 20-40 later is programming and creativity.
2.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
Programming language to be used is determined by the underlying problem to be solved and not the device interface (touch, keyboard or a Mars rover!). If some app is more suited to be written in an FP language that choice is independent of d
3.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
My issue with article is that it makes arument that programming style is decided by the interface or the device which in case of a device like IPAD is totaly false! Yes Thinking in Scheme is different than in C++ but Some programs are more
4.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
What if i wrote a haskell to C++ converter and Microsoft (Wait Apple already did that) banned it because it only wants you to use OO programmin!! Also we know that Haskell/Lisp/Scheme are more suited toward certain applications! Still do yo
5.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
Yeah i know they are different but when one has created a bridge between two languages, disallowing it for some non nonsensical reasons of "computational creativity" seems utterly stupid to me!
6.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
IT shows perfectly why technology does not brings intelligence. You can give them the best hardware and still they wont become next Google or Facebook founders or use it in any other productive endevour! Seriously most of the human race doe
7.
by Godhelpworld 16y ago
I am sorry to comment harshly but this is most WTF article which i have ever read! To quote the Author """ Specifically, a large number of developers seem to think that they have the right to make software for the iPhone (or for anything e