Gnarl

10 ms·

61.
by Gnarl 4y ago
In the Java sphere, Apache Wicket web framework beats anything I've seen before (in 20+ years of pro dev experience).
62.
by Gnarl 4y ago
No one needs AR to lead their lives. But T.C. needs AR adoption to increase Apple's control over how people lead their lives.
63.
by Gnarl 4y ago
America destroys everything - either with b0mb$ or remakes.
64.
by Gnarl 4y ago
Yep. I do not own a mobile-phone. Never had a "smart"-phone. Finally cancelled my last GSM subscription ~2003 after having not used it for long. Reason: the RF gave me headaches & concentration problems. Yes, its the RF. At ho
65.
by Gnarl 4y ago
With Outlook being mentioned as the "killer application" for staying with Windows, I'm curious to learn if anyone has evaluated Evolution (Linux groupware) and found it lacking in key areas? If so, which?
66.
by Gnarl 4y ago
Siemens Gigaset DL500A. Has DECT & bluetooth, but that can be disabled. Has ethernet also.
67.
by Gnarl 4y ago
The issue was settled in 1991 in a series of double-blind session where participants could detect exposure with 100% accuracy (link below). What you are quoting is a widespread myth perpetuated through particularly bad science where shrinks
68.
by Gnarl 4y ago
I have no cellphone. Not since ~2003 when I finally cancelled my cellphone subscription altogether. That was GSM/flip-phone. Never got a smartphone. I have a fancy business landline phone on my desk with an address book, different ring
69.
by Gnarl 4y ago
Go to: the tapping solution dot com Give it a try. I think you'll be surprised at the results. Before you judge this method, known as "Emotional Freedom Technique", consider that the U.S. Veterans Admin. approves it for treat
70.
by Gnarl 5y ago
You may want to consider this: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863242_Oxidative... TLDR; 93/100 available studies (2015) confirm that low-intensity RF causes oxidative-stress mediated tissue damage (i
71.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Q1: How much ambient RF spectrum intensity has there been during evolution vs. sunlight exposure? Q2: How much has ambient RF spectrum intensity risen today vs. natural background levels? A1: Virtually none. A2: 10^18
72.
by Gnarl 5y ago
"Stop being afraid" ?? So a sci. discussion melted down to an unsolicited pop-psych consultation. Your argumentation is flawed. Have a nice day.
73.
by Gnarl 5y ago
I'm usually very patient with the leftovers of the "ionizing only" crowd and what you call "gish galloping" (huh?!) was my attempt at nudging you to discover the science that shows that worldview to be outdated. So
74.
by Gnarl 5y ago
@erdos4d Completely different frequencies. Can't compare like that.
75.
by Gnarl 5y ago
What are the natural background levels of RF vs. sunlight from an evolutionary perspective? Consider whether organisms would spend energy evolving protections against a dominant spectrum of wavelengths vs. hardly measurable spectrum. Also,
76.
by Gnarl 5y ago
You may find this interesting on the topic of importance of modulation, polarization etc.: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/59/5/92
77.
by Gnarl 5y ago
When talking about RF effect on living things it helps to take a step back and look at the bigger picture: biology. Consider secondary effects like RF causing overproduction of reactive-oxygen-species (free radicals) leading to damage in ex
78.
by Gnarl 5y ago
@sobriquet9 "I'm not sure how modulation could have an effect". Look up voltage-gated ion-channels in cell-membranes. Good starting point: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/59/5/92
79.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Are single-photon models even useful here? What about aggregate photon effects? The sheer amount of photons hitting you from a cell-tower is enormous. Perhaps an "optical tweezer" type effect could happen? And for the non-therma
80.
by Gnarl 5y ago
@dragontamer: "Radiowaves have the least effect on our body" - but what happens when you modulate them at a secondary, low frequency, that disturbs voltage-gated cell-membrane ion-channels? Just hoping to pique your curiosity into
81.
by Gnarl 5y ago
@nuvious Apparently, it ain't that simple. If you lump together all brain tumour types , you won't see much happening, but once you split the stats into tumour types an interesting picture emerges. The incidence of glioblastoma&#
82.
by Gnarl 5y ago
The reason for posting that link was b/c it contains a short perspective on the study in question. A TLDR; of sorts. But here's the study itself on the main authors ResearchGate page: https://www.researchgate.net/p
83.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Your link is one person identifying as sceptic and who just circles around to the "non-ionizing can't harm" claim, again. The other attacks the publishing journal. Where were you going with this? None of the commenters seem t
84.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Hint: its much more about biology than just chemistry.
85.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Study highlights: device usage 1 - 20 minutes per WEEK. Study population born 1935-1950, less likely as users of tech. No actual exposure data. Can't take this seriously.
86.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Lookup "Emotional Freedom Therapy", or EFT for short. Also, alternative "FasterEFT". Its a gamechanger. At 1st it may not make any sense at all, but just give it a wholehearted try. Energy-medicine for the win.
87.
by Gnarl 5y ago
Norwegian is underhyped; performs way better than Swedish. Stop quibbering over programming languages already and just build well-tested, robust software.
88.
by Gnarl 6y ago
"Shrinking GDP is very hard to pull off" . Isn't that what's happening right now? With govt's carpet bombing their economies through lockdown?
89.
by Gnarl 6y ago
Unfortunately, it is a real person. A Danish politician: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Auken
90.
by Gnarl 6y ago
"The Body Electric" & "Cross Currents" by Dr. Robert O. Becker got me into health effects of wireless radiation exposures. "The undercover economist" by Tim Harford got me interested in economics. "Rul

More ›