Glavnokoman

5 ms·

1.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
How do you do that? Directly into currency or in china-traded stocks? Which broker do you use for that?
2.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
yeah... and it would be great if decrease in quantity would come with increase of quality. People themselves, their life conditions, human life appreciation all that stuff you know. (Cause I do not understand why would somebody want 2x of f
3.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
Half of software you mentioned is just garbage inside. And it will never be rewritten simply because it happens to work good enough to discourage any serious investment in rewriting it.
4.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
Here! I'd say it is most of the time the bad code.
5.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
Same here. And every time that was a mistake and the fork sucks.
6.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
Why not? It is very young (on countries scale) and burns money of investors without producing much value. Typical startup.
7.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
No. I do not think he's implying it is a bad thing by itself. Instead he explicitly says that those are the people who try to solve their problems at expense of others.
8.
by Glavnokoman 4y ago
Amazing. Kind of a gem that still keeps me subscribed to HN.
9.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Just read the article. That particular "source of information" is one-sided at least. I guess on Russian side that's still an overreaction but the country is at war (although they claim the opposite) so its... hmm... natural
10.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Apparent reason is losing hope to monetize the product. They literally do not care how popular or beloved it is. In the end it is the business and not a charity foundation.
11.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Go to defense sector. They are darn honest about what they are doing. They are doing no nonsense, guaranteed to be some interesting stuff. And killing people is the best thing you can do for environment. Space can also be an option.
12.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
"Plus the whole modern hardware comment is not well founded, since I like..." That is exactly the essence of Linus comment. If some people choose to do something that does not mean the rest needs to accommodate. 80 chars limit is
13.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
"In reality, the biggest source of water pollution is farming, followed by sewage" That's from the article. I do not see how the proposed wealth redistribution would make people eat and shit less. Accept it - we are just tooo
14.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
"The government making a value judgement about what type of commercial activity is worthwhile is extremely risky" Bullshit. That's what government is for. It already forbids commercial activities as robbery, stealing, fraud e
15.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Where do you get the number of 4 billion? I mean I think that is still too many but I really wonder how you calculate that.
16.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
How about chess? And with music!
17.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
But that is actually good for environment.
18.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
I guess "feel" might not be the exactly right word here but the "pain" is.
19.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Exactly. If the problem does not involve the "Aha! moment" the kids won't love it. And there's no way to have both "Aha!" and 90+% scores.
20.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Really? Paying to people for doing harm but less than their neighbors? That's ridiculous.
21.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Having been to the both sides of it I can say there exist exactly 0 advantages of a monorepo setup.
22.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
actually it becomes easier since the frontier length growth linearly and the surface proportionally to the square of some characteristic size of your plot. The other thing is that you can't do it yourself starting from some point, so y
23.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
From a pure logic point of view you'd better kill somebody who thinks the more people the better. But people are generally not good with logic especially when their beliefs are questioned.
24.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Sounds good, but that will only make him 2 million.
25.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Where did he indicate he wants to work for Apple?
26.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
> it just seems so weird to have opening hours to the nature No it is not. The natural parks are there to protect the nature and not to entertain the crowds of bored retards.
27.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
Yep. Women education is the only thing with proven negative correlation to birth rate. That's why apart from WWF I only donate to women education in Africa.
28.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
That's just a selection bias. No reasonable conclusion can be driven from all that. Even if you believe that extrapolation like that could make any sense.
29.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
You are right. But isn't it sad and wrong that destroying wilderness is less expensive than fixing the roof?
30.
by Glavnokoman 5y ago
I do not understand why solar fields do not take the ample roof areas. That is usually just wasted, even worse the roofs are mostly of some dark color where I live, they heat up the area for no good reason at all.

More ›