Giraffenstein

4 ms·

1.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
The responses to this issue appear to fall into two groups: The first group doesn't care, and the second group is apoplectic but is unable (or unwilling) to explain why.
2.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
>Should we assume any competent government like China (through it's Great Firewall) has gained access to a large pool of secret keys used on the internet? The potential that they have known about the exploit for 2 years it is withou
3.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
>each party will try to protect its image. Horvath isn't so much protecting her image as she is heaping dirt upon it. She's allegedly harassed in the workplace, and the first place she goes to is Twitter? Nowhere in the flowcha
4.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
I'm having a little difficulty taking seriously any points that are punctuated with smiley faces. If I'd realized that Ph.D. discussions about the tech industries would take the same form as AIM discussions from when I was in midd
5.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
"YouTube and UK move to auto-censor videos." This is a bold claim that goes unsupported by the article linked. The closest we get is a quote from an Irish Times article: "The YouTube permissions that Google has given the Home
6.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
This is not a good article. It starts with a very bold claim, right in the subtitle: "Google has given officials special access to its video site" I would be very interested in hearing more about this "special access." I
7.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
In the absence of other data, approximately nothing.
8.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
I'm going to out on a limb and suggest it's because technology doesn't track our every move.
9.
by Giraffenstein 13y ago
I'm not particularly satisfied with how this story is presented. The link goes to a paragraph on a website that asks me to complete a survey. This paragraph makes several claims I would love to see expanded on, but they aren't. Th