Giarty

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Giarty 2y ago

   Hey tdeck, thank you so much for taking the time to think about my app! I'm glad you got the concept. I agree with what you write about folks' motivation, let me add that the users of the app are required, if they want to see the
2. 2.▲
   Show HN: An app where you suggest me your vet, I suggest you my babysitter(play.google.com)

   4 points by Giarty 2y ago|3 comments
3. 3.▲
   by Giarty 13y ago

   We didn't want to do a camera version actually, because we see our product as a tool rather than a toy. But then we found it's necessary for object recognition, plus many people are asking for it, so we'll have it, it's
4. 4.▲
   by Giarty 13y ago

   You're right, but the design will improve very much. We are in the middle of the world biggest eyewear industry, and we're making agreements with them for the frame. The point of these first prototypes was only to prove, first
5. 5.▲
   by Giarty 13y ago

   It will be balanced by putting the battery on the right, and regulating the weights. This prototype has no battery because it's still tied to a pc, it's just for testing.
6. 6.▲
   by Giarty 13y ago

   Yes, the litigation is ongoing. We object that we can not call our Glass other than glass, because that's what it is (check the dictionary). Otherwise we want be able to call any other wearable "shoe", "glove", or