Gerardo1

11 ms·

31.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> Because Europeans don't take smart risks. Because they over regulate. If you said you can look at the state of VC funding in the US and call it anything approximating "smart risks" I don't know that I'd believe
32.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
There's no way to know who's funding it (but being at least state subsidized is highly likely), and you we don't really know how much it cost (but in any case it's still less than OpenAI is spending). On the other hand I
33.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> More capable AI systems make the world better. Support that. Now support it while including direct costs and externalities.
34.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> That's simply not true, it's not just "max thinking budget o3" > The specifics are unknown, but they might... Hold up. > but some assume that they do it this way. Come on now.
35.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
That assumes that they've been similarly situated with an offering that isn't profitable and has no path to profitability. What company selling a primarily AI-based service right now is making a profit on that service?
36.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
All very fair caveats/heads up about Ed Zitron, but just for context for others: he is an actual journalist that has been in the tech space for a long time, and has been critical of lots of large figures in tech for a long time. He ha
37.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> You think AWS are going to subsidies your usage of somebody else’s models Yes >indefinitely? No, and that's the point.
38.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> when a discord server adopts some LGBTQ propaganda. There it is.
39.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> It is also additional value creation. Give some concrete examples and stats? > It also leads to automation and efficiency, even if it isn’t a fully linear path. Ditto.
40.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
then you lose a large amount of functionality and value. That's the point they were making.
41.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> In almost every company the usage of AI is becoming more and more valuable. It's certainly becoming more common, and there are lots of people who want it to be valuable, and indeed believe it's valuable. Personally, I find i
42.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
> who doesn't want that to be real. I think that's exactly the point the person you're responding to is calling out. That's a massive bias.
43.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
Only if you don't examine that proposition at all. You still have to review AI generated code, and with a higher level of attention than you do most code reviews for your peer developers. That requires someone who understands programm
44.
by Gerardo1 1y ago
That were written by people. Non-human characters in stories still exist to illustrate something about people.
45.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
I don't think that's a useful lens to view the problem through, or a useful way to have a conversation about MCP security. That a system is hard to secure doesn't negate the need for it to be secure. Though I agree about thir
46.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> considering their saftey risks The safety risks are marginal and you interact with plenty of other things/systems daily that are at least as dangerous. > here are safer battery chemestries that aren't quite as energy-dens
47.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
If your agent materially misrepresents something, do you think you have any liability there?
48.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
* You aren't clear about the goal. The middle of your screen says "Redefining Document Signing" in smaller font but in a blue pill. Immediately under that in large font it says "Turn PDFs toContract Templates in second
49.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
I read this as you suggesting that signal is somehow at fault here? If I'm getting that wrong, ignore me, if I'm not, could you expand that? I don't follow how signal did anything wrong here, or was in any way responsible.
50.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. No one cared. One of the better things a president has done for the country in quite a while, and no one cared, and no one remembers.
51.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
If the capacity existed to build residential properties at that scale (much less at a price that wasn't absurd), there wouldn't be a need for this bill.
52.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
There are at least several thousand years between the last non-modern human hominids dying out and the first writing emerging.
53.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Ah gotcha, thanks!
54.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
I do feel you have a bit of an ethical obligation to also have a "how to avoid leaking this information" section in your README.
55.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Why would you want that? I would, in general, prefer that incorrect information about me was shared with spammers, if any information is shared. Ditto for most third parties that I don't have a direct relationship with or ongoing co
56.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Yep, it's really transparent and I really hate how so many communities and platforms turn a blind eye to it. It's not a productive comment, it doesn't invite discussion, it doesn't add useful information.
57.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
> Most of those people are silent quitting or refusing to go back to work. Come on, you know you can't just throw that out. Support your claim.
58.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Yep. MCP is a project run by Anthropic ( https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol ) that "enables seamless integration between LLM applications and external data sources and tools." They host a repo with lots of wha
59.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
Is there any indication that the owners of those crawlers intend for them to play nice? I think this form the article is telling: > The Register asked Schubert about this in early January. "Funnily enough, a few days after the pos
60.
by Gerardo1 2y ago
But are you donating to an organization to plant trees? What has the lower barrier of entry: making a point to donate your money, or switching your default search engine?

More ›