Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Gatsky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
691.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
https://www.coindesk.com/the-last-word-on-bitcoins-energy-co...
692.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
This is a new disease, we don’t know what is going to happen in the future. There could be chronic consequences we don’t know about yet, for example. The virus could evolve to have much higher mortality next year. By allowing it to become e
693.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Someone told me ear plugs significantly shortened their time to sleep. I’ve also noticed one can feel relaxed and lie in bed but actually have a lot of residual muscle tension. Consciously trying to relax muscles in upper back/neck, th
694.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Tangentially, are there any good native plotting libraries in Julia? I haven't found one.
695.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
If you aren't accustomed to using classes or python in general, the style of ggplot seems more natural I think. The cognitive load is also slightly less looking at ggplot code in my opinion. But if you use python already, it wouldn
696.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
But what if you had an artificial cessation of economic activity which then suddenly resumed in the midst of a massive fiscal stimulus, unprecedented supply chain disruption and geopolitical manipulation of free trade?
697.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Ah yes, good point, it has been 12 years.
698.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I didn’t mind Consider Phlebas, but I found Excession, Player of Games, The Algebraist and Surface Detail to be more interesting. Against a Dark Background was also good although strictly not a Culture book. Other sci-fi I have enjoyed whic
699.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Beyond these methodological questions, I think that the Mendelian Randomisation approach works best for situations where the effect of some exposure is chronic eg LDL and atherosclerosis, particularly where the disease process may begin in
700.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
This article was posted before several years ago. The whole premise is bumptious - "I can copy data out of a bunch of papers [which I am in no position to screen for quality or relevance], run a canned 'gold standard' analysi
701.
▲
Latest USA Cancer Death Statistics
(cancer.org)
1 points
by
Gatsky
6y ago
|
1 comments
702.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I don't think you can lump physics, life sciences, chemistry etc all together. This article mainly pertains to physics, which is notable for being more cathedral like than other fields, where prior work is very foundational. Physics is
703.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
This is more complicated than it seems. You are comparing a job (HFT) with a pursuit (science). The actual comparison is HFT with academia (the job part). Academia is a terrible job and getting worse over time. Academics have been talking a
704.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
This depends greatly on where you will be studying, where you intend to practice, and your matrix of personal and financial dependencies. Working conditions in medicine are universally poor, frankly. The flexibility during education and tra
705.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I am a medical oncologist in a similar position to you. I agree completely. There is a lot of hype over 'AI' and big data, and plainly ridiculous statements about replacing doctors etc. The technology is fascinating, and there has
706.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I would differentiate prevention from screening. Screening is for early detection of a problem (for example, the Pap smear to detect pre-cancerous lesions on the cervix). Prevention prevents the problem in the first place (eg the vaccine ag
707.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Sorry, I just assumed this was about children due to the nature of the article.
708.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Regarding the protection of one’s children, I am not comprehending why you would have such an extensive list but still allow facebook and instagram.
709.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
This isn’t true. Cancer is often the top cause of death in women depending on which country you are in (eg Australia).
710.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I think the “nanny state” concept is poorly calibrated. If you allow entities to profit from causing harm, or conveniently shift the cost of negative externalities onto other people, day to day life will eventually become so adversarial tha
711.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I would avoid Mendeley. Firstly, they are trying to create a researchgate-style social media spam network layer. Secondly they are owned by the maximally vile Elsevier. Thirdly, their software quality is poor eg. they couldn’t get sync work
712.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Yeah I noticed you can buy large doses of vitamin D in the USA. It is quite cost-effective to get the 5000 or 10000 IU capsules and take one a week. In Australia you can't usually get more than 1000 IU in a capsule at the normal pharma
713.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I think code is remarkably persistent in the scheme of things. Try reproducing a wet lab experimental technique from 5 years ago.
714.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I think about this a lot as well. To a scientist, funding more science and scientists seems like a no brainer. It's not like everything's worked out, we are inured against all the reasonable existential threats, and we all live to
715.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Came here to say this. Experimental design is flawed. The laser electronics are probably interfering with the electrodes.
716.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
As usual for substack, this is maybe one reasonable point at the start followed by a lot of low value padding. The founder of Canva, although amazing, is hardly an example of an 'Industry Academic'?
717.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
For electronic music there is this wondrous creation: https://music.ishkur.com/
718.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I was pretty excited about vitamin D for cancer prevention. I though it might explain higher cancer prevalence further away from the equator. But then Mendelian randomisation studies showed it made no difference. Having said that there was
719.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
I had the feeling that there may be reasons not to put a nuclear plant near the equator as you suggest. I had to check but if they were to do this it would be one of the only reactors in the world essentially right on the equator [1]. One o
720.
▲
by
Gatsky
6y ago
Not sure how one could make such an ill-considered comment. It is always useful to ask 'cui bono?'. Who benefits the most from e2e? Is it the individual? Or is it Facebook and friends, who can use it to drastically lower content m
More ›