4 ms·
I had the feeling that there may be reasons not to put a nuclear plant near the equator as you suggest. I had to check but if they were to do this it would be o
by Gatsky 6y ago
I had the feeling that there may be reasons not to put a nuclear plant near the equator as you suggest. I had to check but if they were to do this it would be one of the only reactors in the world essentially right on the equator [1]. One of the reasons this might be a bad idea is that many winds and ocean currents are trans-equatorial, so a fall out event would spread radiation across an entire hemisphere. The high levels of water vapour and rain may also cause problems. There is also the frequency of earthquakes, which are high in that region [2].
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/mapping-nuclear-reactors-around-the-world-five-years-after-fukushima https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-15/mapping-n...
[2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_earthquakes_1900-.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_earthquakes_1...
- 9nGQluzmnq3M 6y agoWhile earthquakes are frequent in the broader region, Singapore is very seismically stable and sheltered even from tsunamis. For example, the Boxing Day tsunami had zero impact.
- magicsmoke 6y agoIt could also be that most countries on the equator are poorer countries that can't afford the cost of a nuclear power plant. The underdevelopment of tropical countries is a well known phenomenon.