GarvielLoken

16 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   Your method of learnings is flawed. The specific lesson to be learned here is that they changed their view on the solution for a max-flow problem from a serial probing algorithm to a parallel electrical probing solution and lowered the time
2. 122.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   Precisely, a good programmer is more akin to a general organisations and marshalling code blocks then a mathematician calculating his way forward manually. But i guess this is a difference between extraverted and introverted thinking.
3. 123.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   This goes to the heart of the real issue. Programming is expression, more linguistic then maths. What would a lisp program with heavy macro usage map to? Or a newLisp program with fexprs? The programming concepts are abstractions and trans
4. 124.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   So much talk about games and making an appearance. I assure you that I don't care either way what your opinion is of me. It is always choice to handle your reaction. Also you are strawmanning, it is a far cry from that society didn&#x
5. 125.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   I really don't see how you are countering or disproving anything I said, you aren't bringing forth any own arguments for a meaningful discussion, which you yourself admit. 2. If you would supply an argument or article or lines of
6. 126.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   This article strikes me to centrer around concepts such as "impressionable", "self identify" or "feel like a hacker". 1. The author tries to blame society ( everybody except herself ) for not noticing the field
7. 127.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   I really don't like this authors way of writing. His only valid success criteria seems to boil down to something similar in meaning of "An acceptable lisp is a lisp that every single programmer uses it". 1. "Killing adop
8. 128.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   I haven't played it, but i have read the review and Proteus is a new open world game. http://www.destructoid.com/review-proteus-244224.phtml
9. 129.▲
   by GarvielLoken 13y ago

   Okay then i understand, i misinterpret your wording.
10. 130.▲
    by GarvielLoken 13y ago

    "It's bad for the introverted and highly intelligent because it further stigmatizes both of those things, especially in combination. By establishing extroversion and median IQ as "ideal," we're insinuating that the
11. 131.▲
    by GarvielLoken 13y ago

    I am tired of that people equal introverts == intelligence and extroversion == ordinary. Have you actually bothered to learn any type classification system like MBTI or Jungs theories? If you had (have?) then you know that extraversion and
12. 132.▲
    by GarvielLoken 13y ago

    Well that is C:s problem, isn't it? If it want a better measure value then it should be more expressive. I think it is fair.