Garvi

13 ms·

91.
by Garvi 3y ago
Study sample size 20 with questionable methodology and sourced from nature.com which currently has their standards in free fall.
92.
by Garvi 3y ago
The way you just saddened me with this is indescribable.. as I've just deleted 4 paragraphs that could get me into a lot of trouble.
93.
by Garvi 3y ago
Both Apple and Google disabled traffic information for the region not to give away IDF troop movements to the Palestinians. So there's that.
94.
by Garvi 3y ago
I see your one roundabout with poor visibility and raise you two regular intersections with one fatal crash each year each. Both in the radius of one kilometer (of my current position). Checkmate atheists. Also my spellchecker is pointing o
95.
by Garvi 3y ago
Freedom of speech in the US? I'm gonna laugh all the way into negative internet happy points that are gonna teach me a lesson never to say this again, unless this comment gets removed by the local censor :)
96.
by Garvi 3y ago
That makes a lot of sense. I was going off the assumption the technical way would be impractical and an never ending arms race. We'll see, I guess.
97.
by Garvi 3y ago
I had Microsoft, Google and Apple in mind as they are heavily invested into AI. Which big players are you talking about?
98.
by Garvi 3y ago
There's too much money at stake for the big players for this not to be labeled illegal any time now.
99.
by Garvi 3y ago
I did not know that. First time seeing these abbreviations. Thx.
100.
by Garvi 3y ago
> The common abbreviation of accessibility is a11y. What? > We take the A and Y from the beginning and end of accessibility, and 11 for the number of letters in between. This abbreviation also creates a pleasing homophone for ‘ally.’
101.
by Garvi 3y ago
You completely missed my point.
102.
by Garvi 3y ago
> Huh, so covid is more serious than a cold? So you're saying that all those scientific studies that prove you wrong with 0 that prove you right actually prove that the vast majority of scientists, pharmacists and medical doctors ar
103.
by Garvi 3y ago
> The number might become higher but if the economic output stays the same relative to the population the compensation doesn't become higher. You're using the word compensation ambiguously. Your sentence is thus nonsense as I c
104.
by Garvi 3y ago
You missed elaborating on why you believe me to be wrong. > because their energy usage grew way less than their GDP last year Their main energy pipeline got blown up by an unknown assailant last year. They sanctioned Russia and thus stop
105.
by Garvi 3y ago
> the compensation becomes high for no good reason Not for no good reason - supply and demand. Literally the most important corner stone of any capitalistic system. The rest of your paragraph is based on your forced assumption of "n
106.
by Garvi 3y ago
It's cheap labor for employers and bad news for German employees who felt the jobs weren't paid enough. The employees who wouldn't work for a "hungerlohn" are forced now as the emplyeers have absolutely no incentive
107.
by Garvi 3y ago
It didn't used to be the case.
108.
by Garvi 3y ago
The title is a lie as it implies the Russians pulled out of the agreement first. Unfortunately I'm stating the obvious. This means your question wasn't sincere as your reception of the answer most likely wont be. Be aware that it&
109.
by Garvi 3y ago
> and yet another few million pieces of e-waste are generated That's money generated while the e-waste is not factored in. I know I'm stating the obvious. But it's a problem with being realistic, as you start seeing idiosy
110.
by Garvi 3y ago
Yeah Bloomberg is not a reliable news source I'm afraid. The amount of straight up false propaganda they're putting out lately is scary.
111.
by Garvi 3y ago
You mean the next gen jets that cannot fly in harsh weather conditions and are solely designed to make money? You know the ones that are only being used simbolically in patrol missions over europe while the old F-16s fly actual combat missi
112.
by Garvi 3y ago
Right after we calculate how many days a person can hold his breath underwater. The idea itself is so ridiculous and vile, it makes HN look like a bunch of children.
113.
by Garvi 3y ago
No one made the analysis as there was no analysis. This is propaganda. Unclear whether OP is a tool or gets paid to stir up hate against an ethnic group. One can look up legitimate military analysis of US vs. Russian missile capabilities an
114.
by Garvi 3y ago
> The downvotes don't put food on your table. Remaining quiet around people joking about genocide would follow me around in my conscience. Also fearing downvotes is like an admission to defeat. Besides - all it took for the patriots
115.
by Garvi 3y ago
Dear diary: Today I took part in a debate on an engineering forum on whether the US could take Russia in a nuclear war.
116.
by Garvi 3y ago
> whether or not such an analysis about western missile superiority could be true or not I'll go with US military experts saying Russia has a clear edge in missile tech and the fact that 10k nukes kill the Earth 1000 times over. Wha
117.
by Garvi 3y ago
Care to pass it around?
118.
by Garvi 3y ago
> if a nuclear war was to break our (for whatever reason) the US now appears to have an edge over Russia What does that mean? Are you not aware that even a relatively small amount of 10 average modern strategic nuclear weapons is enough
119.
by Garvi 3y ago
Feels like Reddit. Getting downvoted because I'm ridiculing the idea of preemptively nuking hundreds of million of people because "they're our enemy". A shameful display for mostly US engineers. Of course without replies
120.
by Garvi 3y ago
You are aware you're using the word "hopeful" in a sentence that's exploring the killing of hundreds of millions humans for a perceived personal gain. Do you think such thinking is justified because of the Ukraine war? I

More ›