4 ms·
> if a nuclear war was to break our (for whatever reason) the US now appears to have an edge over Russia What does that mean? Are you not aware that even a rel
by Garvi 3y ago
> if a nuclear war was to break our (for whatever reason) the US now appears to have an edge over Russia
What does that mean? Are you not aware that even a relatively small amount of 10 average modern strategic nuclear weapons is enough to trigger a 100year nuclear winter? US and Russia have a combined number of 10k+ of them. I thought there were engineers on this forum. Saying what the OP did would get you fired in my company same as saying what you did. Not for the ideological implications, but because of the complete lack of critical thinking. Are you getting any of this?
- vsnf 3y agoI am sympathetic to stance here, no one is claiming nuclear war would be anything other than catastrophic. But the question at hand here, and to which your charged reaction is causing you to miss, is whether or not such an analysis about western missile superiority could be true or not.
- Garvi 3y ago> whether or not such an analysis about western missile superiority could be true or not I'll go with US military experts saying Russia has a clear edge in missile tech and the fact that 10k nukes kill the Earth 1000 times over. What you're saying is simply insane. The fact you're completely omitting my points made, means you're one of the people one cannot reach with reason. You'll cheer for your team and kill the enemy, no matter what that means exactly.
- postingawayonhn 3y agoRussia has no edge. Ukraine is routinely shoots down their "hypersonic" missiles with US Patriot air defense systems.