Gagarin1917

4 ms·

1.
by Gagarin1917 16d ago
I mean they’re similar because it’s the same thing happening… light not being able to reach us.
2.
by Gagarin1917 24d ago
I’m not talking about micromanaging, I’m talking about relaying the information to the actual CEO (Steve Balmer I believe?) and ensuring they achieve the goals.
3.
by Gagarin1917 25d ago
If the President of the board has an issue with how the company is fundamentally operating, they go to the CEO. If the CEO doesn’t understand or doesn’t prioritize the concerns of the board, then they get replaced. He’s may not have been th
4.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
A lot of self described artists seem to believe that the artist is the entire value of works of art. At least, that’s what they’ve claimed since AI hit the scene. I can’t tell if they’ve always felt that way or if they adopted it in order t
5.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
No, no, I get that the general deal was public information. I’m not doubting that Anthropic partnered with SpaxeXAI for additional computer. I said as much in my original comment. What I’m doubting is your claim that SpaceXAI is giving them
6.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
I’m not sure what you’re referencing, I can’t find any source for this. Why would they offer an 80% discount? Hardware is the limiting factor for many AI companies.
7.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
I thought SpaceXAI was making like $25 billion a year renting out hardware now?
8.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
What? What are you talking about? I’m clearly likening it to the subject of this thread: using government to create protectionist policies. 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs is a protectionist policy by Biden. Banning Chinese AI would be a protec
9.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
> Maybe... maybe... if this were a discussion about only his protectionism on Chinese tech, yea, maybe you have a point. That is the discussion though… Too many people here are acting like Trump is the only one who would do this. It’s ve
10.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
I mean, both sides do implement protectionist laws. Did we already forget about Biden raising tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect the auto industry & unions? I’m not sure you’re looking at things quite fairly.
11.
by Gagarin1917 2mo ago
I don’t think there’s much reason to believe a Democrat or a different Republican would be less likely to implement protectionist laws. That’s kind of a reoccurring problem. Remember when Biden increased tariffs on Chinese EVs because they
12.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
Any models that can understand thick accents better than I can? Anytime I’m talking to an Indian on the other end, I have to have them repeat everything 2 or 3 times.
13.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
If you’re worried about this why are you using a third party AI in the first place? Running any query in Claude or Codex could result in the AI reading/uploading any file in your codebase.
14.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
Individual firms can cut jobs while the overall economy sees more of that job pop up. That’s what happens when individuals become more efficient, new projects become more economical and more companies end up requiring these jobs.
15.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
>You seem to think that non programmers don't ask LLMs to program for them. Because they largely do not. Are you actually under the impression that the average person is using chatbots to program? That’s wayyy off. >Maybe that&#x
16.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
>LLM doesn't think You don’t realize I’m referring to the process of generating a ton of text in an attempt to better address the request - a process that these LLM companies call “thinking”? Are you out of the loop or are you takin
17.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
That’s not true. The different use cases of LLMs objectively use different amounts of tokens. AI coding agents can parse half a dozen or more files on each request, plus use a ton for thinking. Writing an email barely uses any in comparison
18.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
It doesn’t matter what “most people” are, coding agents use an obscene amount of tokens, literally millions per day. Every request to an agent needs to parse at least several different documents/files.
19.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
No not at all
20.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
But why if that costing anyone money? You can generate like 50 of that kind of thing using various chatbots throughout your day. You don’t need a pro account for emails.
21.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
I’m not saying “It’s crazy to ever write emails with AI.” I’m saying it shouldn’t hardly cost any money, emails are not token intensive and most people could likely use the free version of chatbots just fine.
22.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
But surely the free version of any of the chatbots is enough to achieve that, right? You don’t need a Pro subscription for that.
23.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
>And in coding specifically, the speedup is real and comes with its own bill. Oh so this article isn’t really about where AI spending is actually happening. I HOPE people aren’t spending money on AI writing emails. That’s definitely not
24.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
What website/service actually uses that?
25.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
What?! It makes it look like a giant fighter jet
26.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
Now?
27.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
You think too highly of California voters. All they have to do if frame it as an unnecessary freedom that only conservatives and wackos want to keep and they will 100% support it. They see their state as a sort of oasis in the country and w
28.
by Gagarin1917 3mo ago
They’re just waiting for the union to fall apart and then those will be next.
29.
by Gagarin1917 4mo ago
I wasn’t saying it needs to be positive, I’m saying he’s a super boring movie character. A whole movie about him being fired from OpenAI just doesn’t sound compelling. A simple documentary would be a much better format, and likely more accu
30.
by Gagarin1917 4mo ago
Honestly not that big of a loss. Even if it’s Sam Altman being an ass the entire movie, it still wouldn’t be a good film because it’s about a wet blanket. He’s not Steve Jobs or something. It’d be about as interesting as a Jeff Bezos film.

More ›