GTP

36 ms·

391.
by GTP 2y ago
> These days everyone types on a keyboard It was common to type on a keyboard also before, it just was a typewriter's keyboard.
392.
by GTP 2y ago
Lol, such a childish excuse to not answer.
393.
by GTP 2y ago
How would those 5 lines of code look like? The base of this solution is that it asks to solve a computationally-intensive problem whose solution, once provided, isn't computationally-intensive to check. How would those 5 lines of code
394.
by GTP 2y ago
I doubt, as the article mentions scraping the same resource after just 6 hours. AI companies want to make sure they have fresh data, whileit would be hard to keep such a database updated.
395.
by GTP 2y ago
I'm not an AI expert, but it seems to me that the common consensus is that current LLMs are quite inefficient and that there's room for improvement.
396.
by GTP 2y ago
Ok, let's have a very concrete discussion then: how would you implement this on top of the current protocol stack?
397.
by GTP 2y ago
This is done at larege scale, but IIRC if you invest in photovoltaic for your home you're supoosed to break even in about 10 years. But it may depend on local laws (read, incentives) and sun irradiation.
398.
by GTP 2y ago
Interesting, can you share which kind of websites you noticed doing this?
399.
by GTP 2y ago
Regarding the first two points, maybe Kopia [0] come close. It has both GUI and a CLI. For the GUI, it saves your backup key for you (although I have to admit I didn't check how much securely stored it is), but you still have to keep a
400.
by GTP 2y ago
If you had the time and energy, how would your ideal solution look like?
401.
by GTP 2y ago
Which is just a convoluted way of saying that it is possible to write bugs in any language. Still, it's undeniable that some languages make a better job at helping you avoid certain bugs than others.
402.
by GTP 2y ago
> using an llm to write a parser You're assuming OP needs an LLM to write a parser, since they mentions writing many during their career they probably don't need it ;)
403.
by GTP 2y ago
Still, I wouldn't use an LLM for what's essentially a database query: by their very nature, LLMs will give you the right answer most of the times, but will sometimes return you wrong information. Better stay on a deterministic DB
404.
by GTP 2y ago
> Is there a difference between providing an "unlock code" upon deprecation, and requiring "support for every possible integration"(?)? As a different engineer than the one you where replying to, I can say that yes, t
405.
by GTP 2y ago
> The scientific method treats everything as wrong or a lie by default No, the scientific method requires proof both for a positive and for a negative answer. If we can't prove neither, all we can say is that we don't know whet
406.
by GTP 2y ago
29 points, five commments & on HN's front page. Still early, but it is growing fast.
407.
by GTP 2y ago
This reminds me of a quote from dr. House. In one of the episodes with the smart girl that also studied mathematics (I don't remember her name), Cuddy said something like "You will figure this out, the sum of your IQs is over X&qu
408.
by GTP 2y ago
Looks like an April's fools joke, but it's real :D
409.
by GTP 2y ago
At a cursory look, and from someone that's not into machine learning, this looks great! Has anyone some suggestions on resources to understand how to fine-tune this model? I would be interested in experimenting with this.
410.
by GTP 2y ago
Sorry, could you please explain what this means? I'm not into machine learning, so I don't get the jargon.
411.
by GTP 2y ago
> 1-8 ARC A770 To get more than 8 t/s, is one Intel Arc A770 enough?
412.
by GTP 2y ago
Uhm, but then, it would work only if applied to the same entity that was deceptive in the past. Applying this to some other party would still make little to no sense, unless you've got some reason to believe this other party wants to d
413.
by GTP 2y ago
This isn't a project unique in his genre. There are also others like Mailu[0] that, although different in the implementation (Docker containers abstracting away the hard parts of deploying "traditional" components) share the
414.
by GTP 2y ago
I think it is easy to highlight the mistake by rephrasing the argument as OP did. By rewriting it that way, I think it is easy to see that the fallacy lies in taking some specific observations and saying that those are valid in general, wit
415.
by GTP 2y ago
It did provide some protection, as it wasn't burned like the rest of the body. They're not saying that it provided perfect protection, only some protection.
416.
by GTP 2y ago
Now, this is a fossil I would like to have!
417.
by GTP 2y ago
> Preferring Firefox to free Chromium alternatives requires a level of nuance and tech literacy that most people will never have I think it's already the case that only tech literate people prefer Firefox over Chrome or Edge (I bet
418.
by GTP 2y ago
Yes, compute is cheap, but it was the actual lab procedure that required expensive equipment while also being time-consuming (although I don't remember the time required, maybe it wasn't that much). I remember the professor mentio
419.
by GTP 2y ago
From what I recall from a bioinformatics course, I really doubt you can have your DNA fully sequenced for just $200. But, prove me wrong, do you have some resource saying otherwise?
420.
by GTP 2y ago
She tried, but the point was that the doctor wasn't available at that moment.

More ›