GPerson

5 ms·

31.
by GPerson 19d ago
You’re conflating two ways of understanding “credit”. One version is what the tool gets, an honest description that the tool solved it. The other is a concept used in the math community to divvy up job opportunities.
32.
by GPerson 19d ago
Dude you’re so far removed from understanding anything about what the math community thinks. Just stop this nonsense. This is not “your” result.
33.
by GPerson 19d ago
They accelerated zero learning. Read the blog.
34.
by GPerson 19d ago
No this guy demonstrated zero intelligence unless the word has already lost all meaning.
35.
by GPerson 19d ago
Kevin Buzzard is famous. You’re pedantically misinterpreting my comment to feel clever. You have nothing more to make of my comment because you don’t care to consider the actual problem here.
36.
by GPerson 19d ago
You have no idea how mathematics has progressed for thousands of years. How about having some humility and understanding the culture you’re cheering on the death of? It’s a goddamn credit based system.
37.
by GPerson 19d ago
Nope I’m airing them right here. This guy didn’t do any work except tell the bot to continue for a month. That’s not work, that’s just unhealthy and negative. He’s made no intellectual progress. He doesn’t even know any mathematics and has
38.
by GPerson 19d ago
> flippantly participating in the destruction of a culture
39.
by GPerson 19d ago
You’re just mentioning established and famous people. What about the average people who are just going to get fucked for spending their lives trying to promote humanity, just to be rewarded with the risk of economic ruin and no job prospect
40.
by GPerson 19d ago
Luckily for these guys the problem is famous enough that giving some kind of credit for its resolution even makes sense at all. The vast majority of published work is not like this. There’s not going to be any credit divvied up to the thous
41.
by GPerson 19d ago
It is a famous problem!!!!!!!!!! You literally understand nothing about the culture you’re stomping all over.
42.
by GPerson 19d ago
Since you respect Terence Tao, but not the general population of mathematicians, maybe you’ll read his blog posts which describe the ways your actions are detrimental to human striving.
43.
by GPerson 19d ago
This is just fucking absurd.
44.
by GPerson 19d ago
I usually shit post on this website because it’s full of amoral idiots who just want to make a lot of money and don’t care about others, but I want to suggest to you that arguing using extreme analogies is almost never a persuasive rhetoric
45.
by GPerson 19d ago
I disagree with the other guy. I think you’re a bad person flippantly participating in the destruction of a culture, wasting people’s time.
46.
by GPerson 19d ago
Thanks for encouraging the end of our career.
47.
by GPerson 19d ago
That’s because you have literally no idea about anything you’re weighing in on.
48.
by GPerson 19d ago
It’s because most people contrive arguments to support what they feel. They don’t examine arguments on their merits and then decide what’s right.
49.
by GPerson 19d ago
This is just an immoral thing to do. If you don’t understand why you should read Terence Tao’s posts about stripmining. This guy isn’t committed to understanding anything. He’s just screwing around and hoping other people who are turn this
50.
by GPerson 19d ago
Your comments are irrelevant noise because you’re just making up a bunch of nonsense out of nowhere. Are you a vegetable?
51.
by GPerson 19d ago
Being derogatory is not incompatible with good faith, idiot.
52.
by GPerson 19d ago
It’s not nihilism to see the death of my career.
53.
by GPerson 19d ago
The blog literally says he had no idea what was going on for the entire time.
54.
by GPerson 19d ago
A distinction without a difference.
55.
by GPerson 20d ago
I’m glad you’re being replaced too then.
56.
by GPerson 20d ago
There won’t be anybody around to understand and care about the new open problems if the AI companies proceed with totally destroying the culture of mathematics. Gowers doesn’t care, apparently because it’s just about winning for him. Same w
57.
by GPerson 20d ago
Really hardcore spherical trigonometry comes to mind, but I may be off by a century. It used to be considered fundamental, but almost nobody besides maybe a few historians of mathematics knows the methods anymore.
58.
by GPerson 20d ago
Why is it always a false dichotomy between two ridiculous extremes? Maybe inventing some dangerous technology benefits from human understanding for a bunch of obvious reasons, like human beings being responsible it goes well?
59.
by GPerson 20d ago
Next time you devote 20 years to developing the skills to further humanity only for an unethical group of people to replace you with a stolen version of your work let’s talk.
60.
by GPerson 20d ago
An obvious misrepresentation of the letter and my comment. For what purpose, I don’t know.

More ›