Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
GDC7
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
541.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
Power Law is everywhere, even where you least expect it.
542.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> It's better from a risk perspective to go ahead and get OF into compliance by banning adult material before buying into the platform. Except, there would be nothing left to buy.
543.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
Companies providing those services would exist anyways. The profile of the person founding them would be different. You'd have istrionic risk takers, borderline gamblers carrying the company for the first say 5 years, then they'd
544.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> ownership of digital art is not a notion that had much social consensus around it before the advent of NFTs. I don't mean to disrespect artists but when all is said and done the only question that matters is: "Will a museum p
545.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> If you own a JPG, do you own the artwork? According to the artist who is distributing the work as a token, and also according the social consensus of others who are collecting art in this way, the answer is no. But according to the res
546.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> The distributed work is valued not because of the material (a piece of paper) or its contents (a rendered image), because it was distributed and signed by the artist's hand. Anybody could photocopy that print to produce the same r
547.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> Mr. Musk is not a con-man True. But we also need to come up with a term to describe somebody who seeks personal monetary reward and social relevance before delivering actual and established corporate financial results. Musk has been ab
548.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
Still can't be compared to Bezos, Gates, Brin&Page, Benioff, Ellison etc. They are done. They founded the thing, grew it, nurtured it and now they left and the respective companies are still dominating. Musk can't leave becaus
549.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
By the same token we should shut down the internet, the USD and also credit cards because CP use them. CP also breath air, time to make it illegal? There is no point foregoing privacy if authorities don't even try to precisely target b
550.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
Do people chargeback the 50$ they spend on OnlyFans? Besides PR in the age of revenge porn, what's the technical or legal element which changed compared to 2019? Can't be social because if anything society is in love with porn.
551.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
Why can't these websites simply find other banks to do business with? I mean also overseas, for sure the extra costs (if any) are better than basically killing the golden goose. The odds of Onlyfans becoming the huge phenomenon that it
552.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> The IRS will then involve other law enforcement agencies, sharing the data submitted Let's be real, if the IRS really wanted that money they'd have thousands of anonymous cash drop boxes One of the problems is that there is n
553.
▲
by
GDC7
5y ago
> You don't believe that an individual who robs the country of taxes on 300m of assets isn't abusing the other citizens of the society? Are you against prosecuting money launderers for some libertine reason? There are no taxes