> ownership of digital art is not a notion that had much social consensus around it before the advent of NFTs. I don't mean to disrespect artists but when all

> ownership of digital art is not a notion that had much social consensus around it before the advent of NFTs. I don't mean to disrespect artists but when all is said and done the only question that matters is: "Will a museum pay me, the owner of the piece of art to have it in their collection, so I can generate passive income from it?" In the case of real pieces of art the answer is positive. If this critical component is missing then you are left with a market where you can only sell for profit to an individual bigger fool. 2-D NFTs won't ever pass this test, 3-D NFTs are also in bad shape because museums are a social activity, something the regular person does to shield themselves from the summer heat while at the park with their SO. Nobody dreams of logging into a 3-D museum , alone in their living while wearing an Oculus. Art is a real world, social activity. The process of distributing art is a real world, social activity. Blockchain won't change this.