GDC7

41 ms·

421.
by GDC7 5y ago
> I don't think its about looks at all Name a good looking EV. The EVs hypercars such as the Rivian or the Tesla Roadster Rocket do not count The Lucid even...that's not a hypercar but it fits the supercar definitions in all ma
422.
by GDC7 5y ago
I know it will be unpopular here...but if Polestar decided to go against the trend and make a Gas only turbocharged Polestar-1 at a 30k price point it would give the Dodge Charger a run for its money. Simply put it they'd sell a ton of
423.
by GDC7 5y ago
I honestly feel sorry for the guy. Turns out 200B can bring you mental clarity , stability and contentment. He's more unstable than Kanye, on every issue he has been both pro and against. Often at the same time.
424.
by GDC7 5y ago
> The benefits of both seatbelts and vaccines, not just to a single person but to everyone else around them, are proven and well-documented. Well that's the physics and the immunology part of the science. You still got to do the soc
425.
by GDC7 5y ago
> I don't see how that's actually a counterargument to my statement. It is. The burden of the proof is always on the person or the organization that cares about something deeply enough that wants to perpetuate such behavior. E.
426.
by GDC7 5y ago
> nonsensical It might be nonsensical for you, but for the sort of people we are discussing they ditch the seatbelt and if they ever have any thought about reducing the risk of random accidents they try and doing it with Horsepower and b
427.
by GDC7 5y ago
It seems to me that government has taken up the job of cracking down on people who have a great deal of self-confidence about anything relating to self. For COVID it's the confidence in one's immune system, for seatbelts it's
428.
Ask HN: When was the last time you were involved in a physical altercation?
5 points by GDC7 5y ago|11 comments
429.
by GDC7 5y ago
Hi! Please could you explain some use cases? OpenAI is very strict with GPT-3. Say a company wanted to use Exafunction for email interactions or Discord interactions or even SMS interactions. What would be the setup? How would that work wit
430.
by GDC7 5y ago
The amount of people per square foot surface, the fact that there is no way out and the fact that police cannot rush to the scene A train is not a mall.
431.
by GDC7 5y ago
The amount of people per square foot surface, the fact that there is no way out and the fact that police cannot rush to the scene. It's not like a mall > There is no multiplier effect Your multiplier effect is the initial factor adv
432.
by GDC7 5y ago
> There isn't really anything particularly attractive about trains as a target compared to any other crowded place. The amount of people per square foot surface, the fact that there is no way out and the fact that police cannot rush
433.
by GDC7 5y ago
Ill intentioned people would move across compartments and off everybody with a firearm.
434.
by GDC7 5y ago
I don't know about the TGV and other high speed trains, but in normal trains you can move from one compartment to the other. So I stand by what I said and I claim once again that you only need one ill intentioned person with a firearm
435.
by GDC7 5y ago
This cognitive dissonance is everywhere. Apparently even on HN. There are 100-200 people on a train, some have 300. No security at all. You only need an ill intentioned guy with a gun and it's over for all those on board. They'd m
436.
by GDC7 5y ago
You don't get it. Trains are left to themselves, there is no surveillance. Ill intentioned people can change dynamic of the attack, instead of needing 2 planes and use them as kinetic projectiles against buildings, they'd need an
437.
by GDC7 5y ago
> No queuing in airports, no security checks, just the pure pleasure of traveling. Wouldn't it be nice? All those things are self imposed, and they are strangely only enforced on airplanes. Like the 300+ lives aboard a train are wor
438.
by GDC7 5y ago
> It is unlikely that an American nuclear strike would have wiped out the entire population of the Soviet Union; one would expect a targeted strike on critical government and army facilities, or something like what happened against the J
439.
by GDC7 5y ago
In fact they reacted before. With spies inside Project Manhattan. Both the UK and USSR reacted with what they could, meaning their intelligence and espionage. It's kind of a selection bias considering that the only country capable of b
440.
by GDC7 5y ago
How is that possible? Even if the US bombed the USSR and prevented a counterstrike the US would have been worse off. You don't get to subtract 100M people out of 2.7B , the 2nd country in GDP and expect things to remain as they were be
441.
by GDC7 5y ago
This and the other 3 letter agency attract all sorts of monodimensional individuals. They are more concerned with doing something that is very hard instead of asking themselves what's the rationale behind it and most importantly who is
442.
Bill Gates, Larry Fink 25mins Interview on Clean-Energy Push(youtube.com)
1 points by GDC7 5y ago|0 comments
443.
by GDC7 5y ago
For sure you have somebody in your life who had a car crash? Maybe somebody who is not with us anymore due to a car crash. The health problems caused by ICEs are as easy to solve as wearing an N95 mask. There is no reward in electrificatio
444.
by GDC7 5y ago
With all due respect this is madness. If by some hail mary miracle we manage to get Level 5 or even advanced Level 4 that should be the priority for the automotive industry, not electrification. Government should throw money at the problem,
445.
by GDC7 5y ago
What is the definition of influencer anymore? To me people like MHKBD seem reviewer more than an influencers , but if you remove people like him basically all you are left is girls showing their goods on instagram hoping to get picked up by
446.
by GDC7 5y ago
Richard Feynman on pseudoscience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWr39Q9vBgo
447.
by GDC7 5y ago
Ferrari's logo is a prancing horse Lamborghini's logo is a raging bull Seems fitting, we don't need those animals to be in captivity anymore. We needed them for our survival for such a long time but we don't need them an
448.
by GDC7 5y ago
> It unfortunately that there is so much misinformation about things like the bailout If you are an organization with 6000 nukes, 22T GDP, largest navy and airforce you don't get to cry about "misinformation". People don&#
449.
by GDC7 5y ago
No, I don't think you can. You can't legislate luck which spurred the monopoly. You'd just move the problem elsewhere (eg. in another sector of the economy or within government)
450.
by GDC7 5y ago
> If there is likely to be only one social network (broadly speaking), then does that opine on whether that network can choose to be ad+tracking funded and free, or paid? I think it's immaterial. You can't legislate Power'

More ›