FussyZeus

196 ms·

1711.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Two things: - I have zero problem with a company releasing info pertaining the character of an employee. - If you're an employee doing your job honestly, you shouldn't either.
1712.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Well in the first place I didn't mean strictly Amazon, I'm speaking in general. I'm talking more about the general attitude that "this guy stole from us/our customers/our vendors, but we can't say anything
1713.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Just weighing in on the Olson thing: Why is it considered unprofessional or inappropriate for a company rep to speak openly about the illegal/unethical practices of now former employees? Isn't that a good thing to hear about that
1714.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
That is an excellent point. Well done. That being said, speaking as someone who regularly complains about old people in just about every capacity, I think good old fashioned prejudice is playing the biggest role.
1715.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
That's got to start falling off as a benefit at some point though, right? I mean according to the article at least they're having to machine replacement parts, which has to be multiple times the cost of the original part to do, es
1716.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
I'm way younger but this sounds about right. Every once in awhile I get a recruiter trying to add me on LinkedIn but nothing like the harassment and weirdness described in the article. Then again I'm also in the US. Sounds like th
1717.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
You make it sound like achieving remote access to this machine with two dozen malicious programs on it would be difficult. I highly doubt the machine is as hardened as her Facebook is. The chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.
1718.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
As I read it, they got that information from her email, and were I a betting man I'd say probably Yahoo or Gmail. They already had her password; getting it from the website would be trivial. This is all my own assumption of course. The
1719.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
I'd disagree, I think is an excellent example of people who think they don't need to worry about security because they aren't on the Internet very much. It was all pretty mundane I agree, right up until they had her power of
1720.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
"You have a different idea of 1WP than I do. I think most humans have some interest in sex, and certainly most young men in both developed and developing nations would like to have a fair amount of it." But only men in the first w
1721.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
No kidding. Leave them as forgotten as they thought they were in life.
1722.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Wasn't referring to the mass shootings being a first world problem, referring to the varying "crises" presented as justifications FOR mass murder, which are almost without exception pathetic.
1723.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Who cares honestly? It's the same rehashed garbage. First world problems galore. Not getting enough sex, not having enough money, not making enough friends but not being willing to do anything about those things but sit in their baseme
1724.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
As funny as it is watching him explain how he understood it, the fact remains is he probably understood it better than the majority of people in that room.
1725.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Exactly what I was thinking, I'd consider myself pretty financially solid but $50k would ruin me. I'm assuming the OP was doing renovations of some kind already and had the cash on hand, or at least the majority of it.
1726.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
It's unfortunately also true. We've convicted millions of people for nonviolent offsenses and locked them up away from society, away from employment, right alongside truly dangerous people. Now we're letting them out of the j
1727.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Fair. But the takeaway I think would be that these people seem to think making an error in software (which I think sets a new bar for FirstWorldProblems) is grounds for someone to be removed from life, which is kind of amazing since even pe
1728.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
You're right, he didn't say aborted. He said retroactively aborted, which would be murdered if I'm not mistaken. Please show me the technical benefits that arise from calling for someone to be put in front of a firing squad f
1729.
by FussyZeus 11y ago
Can I just say, the comments on this article are amazing. Guys drawing from the experiences of people like Joel Schumacher or the Fortune 500 men. You're writing drivers you nitwits, and based on my experiences with the graphics driver