FormStorm

4 ms·

1.
by FormStorm 15y ago
Fair enough but targeting elected officials, whose job it is to cast votes on all manner of controversial issues, not just this one, is a ridiculous expenditure of resources. Pointing the gun in the wrong direction here, let's focus on the
2.
by FormStorm 15y ago
Excuses. It doesn't address the misguided idea of targeting representatives rather than the companies that deserve to be targeted. If they want they can target TWO companies and focus their resources. My suspicion is, however, that Reddit a
3.
Shortsighted mix of tech and politics(betabeat.com)
1 points by FormStorm 15y ago|0 comments
4.
by FormStorm 15y ago
When you don't like how a representative votes on issues, then you show it by not voting for that representative the next election . The proposal is for retaliatory action, akin to: "let's shoot his dog because he voted a way I don't like.
5.
by FormStorm 15y ago
Someone explain this logic to me - I'm not seeing it. There were 150 companies on the list of SOPA supporters. The internet went after exactly one of them, Godaddy. I'm as happy as anyone to see Godaddy sweat, but who is going after the oth
6.
by FormStorm 15y ago
Great, but what about the other 149 companies on the list of SOPA supporters? Who's going after them?
7.
by FormStorm 15y ago
Though I'm happy that Godaddy was made to buckle by the collective force of the internet, I can't help but ask: what about the other 149 companies on the SOPA list? Has no one thought about this? The only reason the internet went after Goda