FDSGSG

62 ms·

661.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
https://www.haven2.com/index.php/contact https://www.haven2.com/index.php/domains
662.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>To put it in perspective, [in 2010] dating.com sold for 1.75m. That was 10 years ago . "myworld.com" sold for 1.2m in 2017, "jade.com" sold for 1.25m, "vivo.com" went for 2.1m In 2019, "voice.com&quot
663.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
It is. "adventus.com" just sold for 22k. "mymind.com" sold for 36k. "rude.com" sold for 100k. "gorilla.com" sold for almost 500k and "voice.com" sold for 30 million! Any offer below 500k wou
664.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
That doesn't happen. The whole idea is utterly ridiculous, if someone could cash out credit cards like that they'd just buy the cards for dollars a piece and not waste their time on a complicated scam like this. > scam this au
665.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
WU or just a bank transfer to a drop account. They definitely aren't after card info with a scheme requiring this much interaction.
666.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
It's pretty surprising that something this silly gets upvoted so heavily here. Lack of hashing isn't the problem here, the fact that low privileged users can access these credentials is. The author isn't to blame for the sill
667.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Depends very much on which datacenter you're using. I'd imagine google doesn't get much (any) bot traffic from Akamai, so I'm not surprised that their ranges aren't flagged yet.
668.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Your guess is wrong. This isn't a custom version of google. It's just a regular akamai reverse proxy setup. > Either it is for agents in the field to inconspicuously use google By visiting a nsa.gov subdomain served by akamai
669.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Because google recaptcha is served from that domain (www.google.com).
670.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Because Googles geoip DB thinks Akamai IPs like "23.59.250.119 " are in Brazil.
671.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Known weaknesses such as vast and messy codebases? What's the action there? A full rewrite?
672.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
And all evidence put forward seems to suggest that all commonly deployed VPN solutions really suck. Do you simply ignore that evidence?
673.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
You seem to be speculating about some future legislation. What about the situation right now? >I postulate that few if any states will see any advantage in granting that kind of protection to bitcoin transactions, as states have incentiv
674.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>But you can identify distinct stolen/tainted Bitcoin. Just like you can identify distinct stolen banknotes. Not at all. You can merge stolen bitcoin with "clean" bitcoin. You can not do that with banknotes. If you give so
675.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
I guess you're just left with no VPN software then? If WG isn't suitable for production, then OpenVPN, IPSec & co. definitely aren't.
676.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>I don't see why governments have any motivation to extend this protection to cryptocurrencies The governments don't need to do this, the courts do. There's an existing principle they could very cleanly apply here.
677.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> Governments are unlikely to give cryptocurrencies the same legal privileges as the currencies they issue. That's fine, but if the governments don't take action it'll be up for the courts to decide that. >it's goi
678.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
You can write down the serial numbers of paper money you hold, but that's not going to help you recover the money if someone steals the money and spends it at a shop. Traceability doesn't need to be a problem.
679.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>surely ransomed bitcoins qualify as stolen Is this typically the case? As far as I understand, fraud losses for example are often treated quite differently than stolen goods. Are ransom payments really considered stolen? This doesn&#x27
680.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
What does then?
681.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Why do you people have such a weird emotional attachment to your concept of what TLDs should be? Like, who cares? and why? It's not like anyone is actually going to use these gTLDs anyway. ICANNs rent seeking scheme sucks, but beyond t
682.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> common name, like "water" or "air" and that domain should not be on private hands This seems like an entirely separate argument. Domains like .earth and .country are privately owned, nobody cares. http://
683.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> rightful owners So Amazon.com, Inc then? The only party who applied for the .amazon gTLD.
684.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>For international shipping—often something will be in a black hole on various boats + transdock facilities + customs for two months or more, before anyone knows where the package is, or whether it was received at all. Is that very often
685.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Four days is more than long enough to figure out that a tracked delivery has probably been lost. You refund and tell the delivery company to return to sender. This wasn't even a direct refund, just an email making it easy for the cu
686.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Spending time worrying about the wastefulness of tossing a fake watch strap worth a couple of cents would be far more wasteful.
687.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
Stuff gets lost during shipping all the time, why is the automatic refund process weird?
688.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Throw it in the trash? No thanks. Why not? I'd understand the problem if you were talking about some large appliance, but you're talking about a watch strap.
689.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
> but the physical config was accidentally overwritten Overwritten, not deleted. Open file handles can't really help you there.
690.
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>Okay, so he was faced with a choice between being in jail and putting someone unrelated in jail, he chooses to put someone in jail and he is not evil? I'm pretty sure you know that this probably isn't what happened here.

More ›