Extractor212

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Extractor212 4y ago

   Here is the text in question: "We selected the background after carefully investigating the temperature dependence of the non-superconducting CSH sample at 108 GPa, the closest pressure prior to the superconducting transition. We note
2. 2.▲
   by Extractor212 4y ago

   Just to clarify, the only person suggesting the graduate students were responsible is the OP. Neither the retraction notice nor the Science news article ( https://www.science.org/content/article/something-seriously
3. 3.▲
   by Extractor212 4y ago

   They were not at all forthcoming. In the original paper they stated: " The background signal, determined from a non-superconducting C–S–H sample at 108 GPa, has been subtracted from the data." Then after questions were raised, th