Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
EvilEy3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> I couldn't care less about rest of people. When it comes to either me or them*. Small fix to clarify. I'm not some cynical edgelord, don't misunderstand, I probably care a fair bit more about other people than your avera
92.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> We really don't need the amounts of meat (if at all), averagely consumed in the US, EU or many other places nowadays. Not by far. Define need. I don't live to be a drone guided by some moral principles of other human who has
93.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> Please explain ketchup Do you eat ketchup without anything? It has little value on its own. > So massacring uncivilized tribals that are not part of your organized society, like in the colonial days, is OK? Am I back to country side
94.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> farming animals that require less space (such as insects) Do you seriously believe majority of people will eat that?
95.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> You've summed it up in your sentence "live for themselves" i.e. greed and selfishness. There's a line between exploiting others and caring for yourself. I consider myself example of second. I couldn't care less
96.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
There are 700 million people below extreme poverty level(less than 1.90$ a day. Tell them how concerned you are about pigs.
97.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Predators are not counted in billions and aren't conscious enough to say "Hey, Jake over here eating barbeque while I have to eat plant crap" either.
98.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
That's exactly my point. Food lies in gray area.
99.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Because it puts economical interests over interests of people.
100.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
It won't. I tasted meat for thirty years, me and my stomach could instantly recognize when I ate veggie burger.
101.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> and the fact that humans kill for pleasure (taste) and convenience, but let's just focus on the number. Well sorry, not sorry for trying to enjoy the only life that I have.
102.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
This is as unethical as it can be. Animals are the last thing they think about, and I dread thinking what goes into creation of this artificial meat.
103.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> It's clear that humans over-consume and as an "intelligent species" who can make decisions based on morality and ethics, we still collectively seem unable to logically reason this overconsumption will eventually effect u
104.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Because food doesn't fit in the same good/bad area. You can live without tape and murder, you can't live without food. And no, I don't want to eat fake plant based surrogate.
105.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
In terms of food? Yes.
106.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
You'd be surprised how many fellow humans are ready to throw you under a bus. So be careful with statements like that, it won't end in your favor.
107.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
I wish most people be so comfortable in life that they start thinking this bs.
108.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Yeah, I think I saw this movie. Snowpiercer.
109.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Oh noes! Anyways.
110.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
This has nothing to do with JS.
111.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> your average .net dev gets paid less than your average COBOL dev too I don't see how this is a valid comparison. Java being paid better has nothing to do with scarcity of expertise.
112.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
It's not just quantity. Java benefits from all the major players that are using it. Quality of libraries is head and shoulders above anything you can find in .NET world.
113.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Directed by Robert B Weide.
114.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
The value it provides is a Ponzi scheme for elites and lumpens to quickly make money, nothing else.
115.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
YAML developer? No thanks, take a look at DevOps to get a peak of how it looks like.
116.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> We don't lecture lions on any sort of ethics, now do we? Not yet, but we definitely should!
117.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
Not my problem who else?
118.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
I think they understand that this is sarcasm.
119.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
No, he was saying we , implying that we [humans] have to take some responsibility or whatever grandiose idea he has in his mind.
120.
▲
by
EvilEy3
5y ago
> I think it’s fundamentally immoral, period Nope.
More ›