EvilEy3

12 ms·

61.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Ahahaha. Ok buddy.
62.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Carmack would pass those with flying colors.
63.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Most users don't care about that.
64.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Oh noes! My thrasherinos! Think of environment! Just because there's a new version of windows, PC is not turning into pumpkin. It can run forever on old Windows version or converted into Linux machine.
65.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but there's a repository of FOSS called F-Droid which has no ties to Google.
66.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
First they came for my strawman, and I did not speak out - Because I was not interested in discussing matter at hands. Then nothing happened.
67.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> While this is addressed at countries I really would like western companies to take their responsibility in this matter. No thanks. This is not up for companies to do.
68.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> If you are on 7th gen Intel or 1st gen Ryzen, there is no mercy. A 2013 MacBook gets more support than a 2017 Windows laptop. Lmao! I'll cite you whenever someone posts "but muh windowz receives updates for 20 years, why you
69.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
What degeneration of standards lmao. Desktop is the most degenerate of all platforms with their Electron cancer. At least on mobile it's mostly native.
70.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Why?
71.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
/0
72.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Most of my apps are just hobbled versions of websites anyway Most of the time it's the other way around.
73.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Already did long ago.
74.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Groan. Because your average Joe is any of the people that you listed.
75.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Yes. If they want FAANG level developers, they will have to pay FAANG level salaries.
76.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Because advancement offers what? Right, bigger compensation.
77.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
> Shortage of abused developers who work for peanuts* Fixed title a bit.
78.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
No thanks.
79.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Oh noes! I can't use brand to push my political agenda!
80.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Doesn't change anything to be honest. Any parasite should be eradicated regardless of whether it is infectious or not.
81.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Personally I'd rather die than give up one of the main joys in my life.
82.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
That's not an unpopular opinion.
83.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Worth the risk of being food impaired for life? Don't know about that.
84.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Nice, so that excuses lack of any regulation of this monstrocity?
85.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
>> I... wouldn't behave incorrectly in the first place. It's not a difficult concept to understand for most people I hope, especially with sexual harassment. > I wouldn't be poor in the first place! > I wouldn&#x
86.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Alternatively, stop labeling everything and everyone sexual predator.
87.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
No-no-no, you're smarter ™ so that makes it different ™.
88.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Damnit, I'm all out of suffering points today. No meat for me!
89.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
This is borderline insanity. What, you want life without side effects now? The only ethical way is death, since no humans means they don't affect ecosystem around them.
90.
by EvilEy3 5y ago
Oh, I'm sure of it. I want to live comfortable life, not survive.

More ›