Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Evgeny
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
421.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
I think there is nothing wrong with that as long as you feel healthy and are healthy. I think the point of the submitted post was that the author did not eat animal products and became very unhealty. That's pretty much it ...
422.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
I think if plants can't move, that puts them into even worse circumstances compared to animals. At least animals can try to get away from the danger, plants do not even have means for that. I feel more sorry for the plants now. Way to discr
423.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
No one actually knows the living preferences of a chicken or a cow. But does anyone know, without any doubt, the living preferences of a potato or an apple tree?
424.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
* unnecessary extreme suffering is unjustifiable.* I'm wondering, what is the vegan's position on eating: fish; oysters/mussels; squid, octopus; crabs etc.
425.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
But people often do not care enough to change their "choices", even when the negative results are obvious. There must be a reason for that.
426.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Ironically, I'm reading the book now ... "You can't consume much if you sit still and read books."
427.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Okay, I see the point. It is quite obvious with the pants - "pants keep me warm and protect from poison ivy, therefore they are good for me". With food, not so obvious. "Chips and pizza with coke are tasty and make me happy, therefore they
428.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
There certainly must be a limit at some point. Like, for example, amputation of a couple of limbs will not kill you ...
429.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
What if they were just plain hugnry all the time, it was miserable and only the strong survived? I think the point is that regardles of being miserable, hungry or happy, the bodies adapted to the circumstances. Now what happens if you tak
430.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
According to every eating school of thought, at least half of these are very bad. Yet I am perfectly healthy. What I personally would be worried about is the long-term effects. Unfortunately, these would be very hard to pinpoint as it wou
431.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
It really is an eye opener. I was blown away when I started reading about it all. Some good resources if you're interested. I totally agree to that. Those sources changed the way I was thinking about human health and nutrition completely.
432.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
In general though, it's not wise to discredit professionals just because they may disagree on certain things in their field. Unless the field is fully understood (I'm not aware of one which is!), you'll see that. I'd say that the field is
433.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
If there's not enough glycogen in the liver and/or muscles and you are not getting any sugar from food, the body starts degrading your bodies' protein to convert glucogenic aminoacids to glucose But if you have dietary glucogenic aminoaci
434.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
What's the best advice to take? That from a doctor, dietitian, or nutritionist. Not some yahoo on the internet. Well, that's a good advice in theory, but did you notice how many doctors, dietitians and nutritionists have contradicting po
435.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Not quite relevant, but I do not have a practice of skipping breakfast. I am trying however, once in a week or two, to fast for 24-36 hours. This is called "intermittent fasting" and has been shown to produce positive effects. http://en.
436.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Learn you a physiology: http://www.fi.edu/learn/brain/carbs.html I searched this page for "gluconeogenesis" but did not find it. So basically they completely ignore the fact that the body can produce glucose from amino acids, products
437.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Basically, your body runs on glucose. Everything else is a stop gap for you to get more glucose. But don't forget that the body can make quite a lot of the glucose using a process called gluconeogenesis. And substances like amino acids, g
438.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Maybe the supplement is not worth it, but the ratio of omega 6 to omega 3 has been shown to be important. The proper ratio should be somewhat close to 1:1, but the current western diet is more like 10:1 (10 omega 6, 1 omega 3) http://www.n
439.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
How come no one asked yet, was the person who leaked this information fired or not?
440.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
But not mutually exclusive ...
441.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
I think the argument may exist that if you didn't die from alcohol abuse early enough, then your body might have higher than average resistance towards various harmful substances. Therefore, alcohol usage is just correlation, while the real
442.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Those who have already died from alcohol related causes can not be included into the study, which would much reduce the longevity among alcohol users?
443.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
This is basically the central premise of the book The China Study, which is what convinced me to go vegetarian myself You may also be interested to read the impressive critique of the China Study, which is based on Colin Campbell's own da
444.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Not sure if that can fit on the t-shirt, but here are couple of ideas http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2174/2268237733_cda4a1dbb3.jp... http://geektech.geektech.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2... (these are 'captchas' that require you
445.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Luke!!! You're on HN! Small world indeed. Luke's my instructor who taught me a lot already and keeps teaching, so here's one more vote for hapkido I guess.
446.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
We probably are up to our ears. There's just only one careless time traveller.
447.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
I cannot eat celery. I think I loose more calories then I gain eating that stuff Looks like you're right. http://www.snopes.com/food/ingredient/celery.asp Claim: Eating celery results in negative calories. Status: True
448.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
I haven't done blood work yet to see what my cholesterol and thyroid levels are but should have that done in the next few weeks. I'm sure you're very well aware of that, but just noting that cholesterol levels itself is not a good predict
449.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Carbs, protein I recently started to dismiss comments that include statements like "all carbs you need, all protein you need" etc. as not only useless, but actually harmful. The source of carbs, fats, proteins is way more important than
450.
▲
by
Evgeny
16y ago
Well, this particular "fad" has been around for a couple million years or more ... compare that with "eat whole grains" fad for example ...
More ›