EugeneOZ

64 ms·

1. 871.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   thanks :)
2. 872.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   Key of 10 symbols from (latin alphabet + numbers) have 3656158440062976 possible combinations.
3. 873.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   Because it's more difficult than parse "5" and "7", especially when you need to parse not only numeral IDs. "More difficult" always means "more bugs" and "more vulnerabilities". There i
4. 874.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   What is the source of knowledge for the client about fields, where they can read link to the entity? For human it's obvious that dog has an owner, so field "owner" should be used, but for code - you need to write it, "do
5. 875.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   > and he couldn't see luggage problem because was 10 rows from business class rows And you were closer, of course, lol. If _last_ survivor says there was no issue with luggage, there is no reason to think opposite. If he would be pu
6. 876.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   Well, it's hilarious how you are trying to quote parts of witnesses' words just to prove opinion, which is strictly opposite to what he actually told :) Nobody expect that other passengers would leave the plane instantly, so he wa
7. 877.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   He waited because he decided to do this, nobody was stopping him. You are just trying to prove your point by lying, you are pathetic moron.
8. 878.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   Go ahead
9. 879.▲
   by EugeneOZ 7y ago

   Мало ли, кто чего ждал. Важно, что случилось по факту.
10. 880.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    не пизди, не просил он жену ждать. Про жену он пишет только "толкнул вперёд". Про "сколько мы ждали" он говорит лишь "время относительно, не могу точно оценить. Но я не могу сказать, что что-то тормозило эвакуацию&q
11. 881.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Everything is fine with HN front page - technology enthusiasts should talk about bleeding edge technologies. You expect them to discuss VB6 or Sharepoint? Well, problem is not with them. If you don't learn new things your skills will b
12. 882.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Pilots survived and already answered questions - they decided to land because all systems started failing after lightning strike, not because of fire - there was no fire before landing.
13. 883.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    I think plane systems should be able to function after lightning strike. And initial failure of all systems - defect of the plane construction (SSJ-100). It's just my opinion, not official words.
14. 884.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Reason is known - after lightning strike all systems started failing so pilots weren't able to turn off the engines, but they decided to land anyway.
15. 885.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    https://meduza.io/feature/2019/05/07/ya-shel-poslednim-za-mn...
16. 886.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Not sure why they are downvoting you, but it's the main version right now - mistakes of the pilots.
17. 887.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Because it was the exact reason why wings broke (too high speed, too strong hit) and wings is the place where planes store their fuel.
18. 888.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    There are links in other comments here. There are official statements already about accident, main version is "mistakes of pilots". Before asking "sources" from just comment, try to find at least one "source" l
19. 889.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    "Technically only the last survivor coming out could answer that question" And last survivor witnessed exactly this - quick evacuation without any issues with the luggage. "people value belongings wrongly in case of serious a
20. 890.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    It's a total trash article, just sensationally-hysterical crying. "It’s not clear at this point if the plane was on fire before it landed" It is totally clear, just read more official sources. Plane was not on fire before lan
21. 891.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Could you please clarify what Google Cloud did in comparison? I'm not arguing, just want to know more about Google Cloud.
22. 892.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    for me: trash fonts rendering. Some people don't see the difference (I don't blame them), I can't work with Linux-rendered fonts more than 1 hour. Tried Ubuntu and Debian.
23. 893.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Sometimes details don't worth it.
24. 894.▲
    by EugeneOZ 7y ago

    Bs, nobody will read your code. 1 per 10 000 maybe. And even that 1 will be polite enough. Don't spread this bs - people shouldn't be afraid of shaming when they have some code to publish.
25. 895.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    Also in millions of manuals, generated PDFs, sent emails... Some things you just can't "update" anymore.. It's really disastrous change for the web data integrity.
26. 896.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    Superconductors = flying cars. Finally they are working on something useful!
27. 897.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    Pathetic attempt to get some users from HN.
28. 898.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    IntelliJ plugin for Rust can do some refactoring (renaming functions and variables - it's all I use and remember).
29. 899.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    Tried to use it, but even simple tasks were tricky to complete because of counter intuitive UX.
30. 900.▲
    by EugeneOZ 8y ago

    As a parent, I don't need any statistics. If there is a device that can help me to find my daughter if she get lost accidentally - I don't see reasons to don't use it. She can't talk yet but she loves to run to some forb