EugeneOZ

57 ms·

631.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
I still don't think that marketing videos is the developers’ fault.
632.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
I hope CD Project Red devs are reading HN today. I want them to hear: if you feel that the whole world is against you - it's not true. Many people are silently enjoying the game and you will not hear as much from them as from the whine
633.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
I disagree. Maybe don't skip the dialogues :) I have quite a contrary impression - the game is very deep and their world is not so wide as it could be.
634.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Only fail from CDPR was to promise support of the old consoles. It's a mistake of managers, not developers. On PC game is an amazing masterpiece. There are few bugs but they are not critical and easy to ignore.
635.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
What a ”proof”, muhaha. Let’s play this game together: https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/comments/cxqm1u/every... https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/aqmffc&#x
636.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
And 2 of them for a phone!
637.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
It does look like cheap blurry upscaling. I was trying to be respectful to the opinion of people who love it, but you can't be respectful to my opinion. You are saying ”doesn’t look cheap” and ”can’t afford” in the same comment - thin
638.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
You really said nothing to change my opinion. Saying "brilliant" about this pile of garbage is just ridiculous. I don't care how complicated technology, I care about the result. I see results from the RTX-reflections - they a
639.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Ok, people are different, demands to image quality are different. I'm playing on RTX 3090, 1440, 27''. All max settings except DLSS.
640.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Ok, let's disagree. Quality loss is non-acceptable, image is blurry as hell. DLSS is just stupid upscale.
641.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
So that's how games are being seen by the gamedevs :) It was interesting - would be interesting to read something like this also about the RTX-parts, their description sounds so great - I hope they will some day show us the new horizon
642.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Thanks, I misunderstood the idea.
643.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
I often copy-paste names to avoid typos and to don't insult people unintentionally, so your idea about emoji-filter is not perfect :)
644.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
It really depends on language.
645.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Messi is Barcelona FC player.
646.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Hope so. Right now their "support" site says: "If you see this warning, it means that the app was not notarized, and Apple could not scan the app for known malicious software. You may want to look for an updated version of th
647.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Same here. I took my decision to leave macOS after their release of BigSur. It's absolutely, 101% unacceptable to me when someone else controls what program I can run on my hardware, and I should hope that their server will not go down
648.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
”potentially harmful" and "could be dangerous" are not scientific proofs. FUD article.
649.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Thanks for posting this - my vocabulary and knowledge of history have been improved by reading this.
650.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Maybe not 100% yet, but it moves incredibly fast to this goal.
651.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Could you please explain your ”were better” argument?
652.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Can we improve our own brain this way? I mean, brain of our kind, not some already living person. What if we can create a creature smarter than us?
653.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Maybe if author will try to write README in a less arrogant tone then performance will be even better, who knows.
654.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
I'm not an expert in the field of GPU/CPU benchmarks. Is it a synthetic benchmark or not?
655.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
And since when CSGO is a GPU-demanding game? You think "real games" are for "hard triers only", but it's just your point of view.
656.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
Not everyone needs to run Docker.
657.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
”Pro” doesn't implicitly mean ”Pro Video Editor”.
658.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
One little thing left: notify users about the existence of these sites.
659.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
GraphQL should die in the same hell with SOAP. For me 3 reasons "why not GraphQL" are: 1) Access control: rights, permissions, roles - they are just a fog when client can write own query to DB. 2) Knowledge sharing: when your clie
660.
by EugeneOZ 6y ago
> But there's a catch. You have to build a BFF for each individual frontend. Bullshit. I've built a lot of REST APIs and every time mobile apps were reusing API without any issues.

More ›