EsquireCats

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   I thoroughly enjoyed the hypocrisy of this reply.
2. 2.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   I honestly believe that you don't have a firm understanding of what a monopoly is, nor how they are expressed in the market. A large market share does not automatically make a monopoly. (However a large market share can be a key competitive
3. 3.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   This statement is remarkably light on fact and heavy on sensationalism. Apple have received numerous patent disputes for technologies included in the iPhone. They hardly "threw the first punch." I also wouldn't call this an abuse on the pat
4. 4.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   Problems with this line of thinking: 1. Anti-trust implies monopoly. No monopoly on phones here. Plus it's Apple's store, you can't have a "monopoly" on your own product. 2. Apple haven't exhibited a consistent pattern of app rejections to
5. 5.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   I laughed - but there are already plenty of other web browsers on the iPhone platform.
6. 6.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   Maybe they can post a timer showing how long it took them to release it - since in the time that they started talking about Opera for iPhone, there have been numerous other releases from less hype-heavy developers. (e.g. iCab)
7. 7.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   I'm not suggesting that at all - you should always buy whatever is best for you regardless of politics. (Loyalty is for suckers.) However I hope there is a total blood shed and all out patent war. I don't personally agree to the current met
8. 8.▲
   by EsquireCats 17y ago

   It's petty to take sides in either end of this - I doubt anyone is well read enough on the patent portfolios of either company to pass a legitimately informed comment.