Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ErrantX
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
271.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
> Probably an early retirement at best. Or an early grave. As in the case of the person who did try to blow the whistle.
272.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
Perhaps not as a regular income; but if funding for these projects is a limitation I bet crowdfunding would bring in funds to keep these posts coming :)
273.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
I think a completely rational company should try to understand the problem. This is a relatively "known" problem with Slack and other realtime chat (i.e. the timesink issue). It's one reason I'm always cautious every tim
274.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
A less efficient method I used was; press a key until the probability jumps up, then switch keys (probability will go down, mostly) until it goes up again. Rinse/repeat.
275.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
DevOps isn't (just) Dev doing Ops and Ops doing dev, though. It's about understanding each teams domain and facilitating communication. Nothing about Docker limits that, per se. e.g: > I argue that devs are usually not thinkin
276.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
Well sure; but DVCS's don't solve for that problem (or at least, they don't explicitly enable you to work offline). All VCS' allow you to continue to work offline in some form. DVCS allow you to maintain a workflow; whic
277.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
All of which is fine; and in such cases (where this is a common occurrence for your staff) DVCS is a good fit for the requirements. But do these situations represent the overwhelming majority of use cases? In all probability, not.
278.
▲
by
ErrantX
10y ago
> Leadership at the company is by invite only. We’re always looking for more leaders - so you can rest assured that you will be personally invited to formally join the leadership team. Is this not just the performance management you we&#
279.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
I was surprised how popular DVD rental still was in Germany. Someone I know from Amazon was telling me. I get the impression they desperately want to kill off the market for it though?
280.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Delivery has gotten really bad. When they used DPD it was great, but really nothing to do with Amazon, DPD are just far and away the best UK courier. Recently around me they switched to "Amazon logistics" which to me is code for &
281.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Here in the UK Amazon seem to be heading for same-day delivery for Prime customers (we already have free next day on Prime) and ultimately "within the hour" types of delivery in major cities.
282.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
And also, if you got to the point where that porn site was then active and usable enough for the captcha cracking service... it would probably be more profitable just to monetise the porn.
283.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
In the EU this business model has been gutted by regulatory changes which have pretty much fixed the percentage fee at such a low level that there is no margin to offer rewards. > Hopefully the interest paid on debts breaks even with the
284.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
The NMC is a hidden gem. They let you pay a reduced entry fee to see the Heath Robinson machine and Colossus (which is what everyone visiting Bletchley Park wants to see). I've always thought that was a shame because so many people don
285.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
I don't disagree with your point. But FB does allow one way following (you can subscribe to most users public posts).
286.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
At my last company we rolled our own little interface in NodeJS. Simple enojgh and worked really well!
287.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
As an IT manager; the biggest problem with 20% time I've seen is people using for 80% time stuff. Like, critical training they should have gotten as part of normal work, etc. That sucks, that's not 20% culture.
288.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
I'm not a SpaceX fan boy, and I am happy Blue Origin is contributing to this space too. However; going straight up and then coming back down is no major challenge. It doesn't impart anything extra to the test. The novel and hard p
289.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
In the absence of a clear guideline, Researcher101 should kick in; it was clearly the wrong thing to do. An apparent refusal to admit that in the write up is making it hard to put 100% support behind him. There is no excuse: dumping the use
290.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Well from a client library point of view: * Make request * Has error status code? * Error * Make request * Has error string message? * Error Fairly similar code-paths. If there was a very consistent implementation of REST API's and how
291.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_302 Most browsers mis-implement 302; hence 303 (must change to GET) and 307 (must persist request method) were added to make the options explicit. Of course, just because a standard n
292.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
* People who have used the donate/buy buttons before now * People who have bought in-game items for FB games The dialogue supports CC and PayPal & appears to use their existing payment infrastructure (e.g. using any cards/payp
293.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Oh wow! That explains wierd artifacts I've been seeing since El Capitan, when using my trackball mouse. The cursor randomly grows in size, usually when I move it between screens quickly. I expect it's some "random jitter&quo
294.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Both this and the GP are tactics I've seen. I think the community is waking up to this issue; there have been recent bans for people exhibiting this behaviour. It's hard though because you have to unpick a pattern of behaviour and
295.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Mostly it's about recentism. Wikipedia, as all encyclopedias, is usually very good for stuff that doesn't change frequently or in large amounts. But there is a continuing problem with recent and current events. You get a lot of pe
296.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Except, how can you be sure your password was stored securely? You should never assume that. > You don't pick the words yourself, you choose them at random. That's the whole point. Suggest: you're supposed to choose them
297.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Absolutely, use something different and more complex to 4 common words. That's pretty much what I am saying. My argument is that whilst you are switched on to the problem enough to do that, a lot of people simply are not. So stuff li
298.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
What you're actually doing there, though, is applying security through statistics. No, an attacker will not know your schema. But she will know all about the common schemas. And you're risking her using your schema in her attacks.
299.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Of course, it's not the worst schema. But it gets a lot more credit than it is worth. Using dictionary words reduces the entropy of your password significantly. And for a cracker it can be trivial to attack passwords of that form. Give
300.
▲
by
ErrantX
11y ago
Argh! The XKCD entropy comic. Back away slowly.. The "4 common words" password meme was around a lot after that comic. However, such passwords are definitely not secure because a good dictionary attack will break it in hours. You
More ›