ErigmolCt

4 ms·

1.
by ErigmolCt 9d ago
I get the joke, but this is kind of why the security issue matters
2.
by ErigmolCt 9d ago
Exactly. The scary part isn't any single bug, it's the mismatch between the sensitivity of the system and the apparent security model
3.
by ErigmolCt 9d ago
And this seems designed around the assumption that the physical camera can be trusted indefinitely
4.
by ErigmolCt 19d ago
Apps, browsers and "smart" features are disposable software, but a good panel can remain useful for a decade. Makes you wish manufacturers treated the smart layer as optional from the start.
5.
by ErigmolCt 19d ago
I'm inclined to believe the shutdowns were a bug rather than an extremely patient friend waiting for the perfect gameplay moment. But modern TVs having enough remote-management machinery that the prank theory isn't immediately abs
6.
by ErigmolCt 19d ago
At that point network isolation stops looking like a privacy preference and starts looking like an adversarial relationship with a product you own
7.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
I wouldn't sell yourself short on the last one... the comment itself is a decent example of it :)
8.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Maybe the failure mode isn't the PhD itself, but environments where publishing becomes the objective rather than a byproduct of getting unusually good at understanding and building things
9.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
You probably aren't building the next Airbus in a dorm room, but you might build a weird propulsion prototype, simulation tool, control system, manufacturing technique that eventually becomes the reason a company exists
10.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
I think side projects still matter, but maybe in a slightly different way now. They don't necessarily have to become the company themselves. They can be how you discover the problem, test an approach, meet the people you eventually bui
11.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
The irony is that universities are probably best at producing founders when they're not explicitly trying to produce founders. Teach difficult things, put smart people together, give them access to equipment and enough free time to bui
12.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
I suspect rare here often means out of print or commercially obscure, not unique
13.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Copyright holders are certainly responsible for keeping unavailable works inaccessible, but shredding is mostly an industrial scanning decision, not a copyright requirement
14.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
A genuinely useful project would identify publications that are actually rare, poorly catalogued, or held by only a few libraries, then prioritize those for careful preservation
15.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Bluesky trick exposes how strange the abstraction is
16.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Once apps can present one thing to the user and another thing to the captured image, there are some pretty weird possibilities
17.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Agreed… yet I meant "needs" in terms of product features, not maintenance or moderation
18.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
Yeah, 2009-2014 feels more like the old social web to me
19.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
2009 is old web now, and this is how we find out we're old... Yet I think maybe "middle-aged web" is the more accurate term
20.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
HN is a good example of how little a website actually needs once you remove the requirement to constantly squeeze more engagement out of it. Though to be fair, its audience is unusually self-selecting :)
21.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
I think the audience could absolutely shrink back to something resembling the old web. I'm less sure the old web itself comes back
22.
by ErigmolCt 1mo ago
The interesting number here isn't 76.7% dead, it's that 23.3% alive is an upper bound. A server answering HTTP doesn't mean the thing somebody shared in 2011 still exists
23.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
I think the revenue number needs a lot more context for exactly this reason
24.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
And I'm writing my comment to understand it better...
25.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
The really haunting part is that Europeans often arrived late enough to see the collapse, but not early enough to understand what had collapsed
26.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
A landscape does not become "pristine" a decade after millions of people disappear. The human influence would still be everywhere, but it would not necessarily look like European agriculture
27.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
Europeans often failed to recognize Indigenous land management because it did not resemble European cities or farms
28.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
The important lesson is not that ancient people left no ecological footprint, but that a heavily managed landscape can still remain remarkably biodiverse
29.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
Finding hundreds of previously unknown earthworks is a major archaeological result. Extrapolating from them to millions of inhabitants is where I would slow down...
30.
by ErigmolCt 2mo ago
A machine civilization could probably spread into many environments that biology cannot tolerate, but it still has to be invented somewhere first

More ›