EpicEng

82 ms·

871.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Sure, it's a fine workaround for a dying pair, but the GP said: >I'll just address this point, because it is categorically incorrect and something many people misunderstood when they were first released
872.
by EpicEng 8y ago
The quest is an even larger step given the fact that it doesn't require an external PC. But still, I would love to see something more gamer oriented.
873.
by EpicEng 8y ago
That's all well and good if using one were the same as using two. Of course, it isn't...
874.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>Out of interest, what would you say are the key weaknesses at your company that makes successfully hiring, training and managing juniors for remote roles impossible? Faulty premise. I would say that it's simply not worth the risk f
875.
by EpicEng 8y ago
If your use case is using a video streaming service to listen to music then perhaps you should consider using something else instead of fighting against the tide. Don't get me wrong, I do the same from time to time, but typically when
876.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Sure, but a loan you don't repay unless you get placed and make above a certain threshold. They're removing the risk for you and you pay for that once you're able. I agree that the salary estimate is high, and I wouldn't
877.
by EpicEng 8y ago
I've worked as a hiring manager and... yes, there's simply no way I would hire a remote junior dev, and certainly not at that salary.
878.
by EpicEng 8y ago
In my second hand experience (friends and family, IBEW and automotive workers) this is not at all the case. Admittedly, second hand information and only two locals, but the amount of incompetence and ineptitude that they tell me about is as
879.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>e.g. paying employees the full value of their labor instead of profiting from the surplus value created by the employee) Socialism is not the definition of "fair". One could argue that it's not "fair" for e.g. w
880.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>They are built with soldered components which means no upgradeability with the flip side being that the performance is 5 years ahead of the direct competition Who are they five years ahead of exactly? And who told them to make the enclo
881.
by EpicEng 8y ago
And eggs are bad, and if you want to lose weight eat less fat and more pasta! I don't trust anything that comes from these people. They don't have the ability to properly test their hypotheses.
882.
by EpicEng 8y ago
I'm honestly not trying to twist words to prove a point. Apparently I didn't understand what you are trying to say. Calories in v calories out works. It really is that simple. Of course people have different metabolic rates, so yo
883.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>That alone makes thermodynamics argument non scientific. That is just not how human body works. You said that, right?
884.
by EpicEng 8y ago
That's true for people who are only slightly overweight. If you're obese or close to it 2lb / week is easy because the amount you have to eat just to maintain your current weight is ludicrous.
885.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Those are rare and the laws of thermodynamics still apply. For the vast majority of people, eating less/better = weight loss.
886.
by EpicEng 8y ago
GP didn't say that the science isn't true, only that it can be difficult for the average person to use as a measuring stick.
887.
by EpicEng 8y ago
The problem with selective enforcement is that we have no idea under which circumstances future authorities will select to enforce.
888.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Because it's ok to show some empathy for the victims and their families. Most people don't want to see this stuff either. This is one sort of private censorship I have no problem with.
889.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Same here in the burbs. Would love me some fiber, but it's never going to happen.
890.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>My argument is that critics (through reviews) and consumers (through ratings) no longer set HBO's shows apart into a prestige category that HBO dominates. That's an empirically verifiable fact. Based on... ?
891.
by EpicEng 8y ago
"explosive" I think we're done here. It's ok to just say you were wrong you know.
892.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Your entire premise is based upon your perceived quality of HBO's programming.
893.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>I think you're confused. Nope >Explosion in the early 90s != everybody used them in the early 90s. Never said that >Explosion = the industry got traction / was kickstarted and kept on going and going. No, explosion means
894.
by EpicEng 8y ago
This guy is trolling us or... I don't even know what.
895.
by EpicEng 8y ago
I think your definition of "early nineties" is off, and that plot doesn't show what you think it does. Let's recap your own statements. You: There was an explosion of mobile phone use in the early nineties. Me: no there
896.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Well that's because Seinfeld is the best show ever and don't you dare disagree with me.
897.
by EpicEng 8y ago
The comparison was to a random GoFundMe, not national polling. Besides, the field is limited to 20. A candidate may still have to meet the polling threshold depending on how the field does.
898.
by EpicEng 8y ago
>People were still watching laugh-track sitcoms when Oz was in its prime. Like... Big Bang, the number one network sitcom which averages 18.5 million viewers?
899.
by EpicEng 8y ago
This post is completely subjective. It seems obvious that numerous people disagree on your assessment of quality. GoT "not especially good"? HBo doesn't have good comedy? Ever seen an episode of Curb? You then go on to base y
900.
by EpicEng 8y ago
Is the year 2000 now considered "the early 90's"?

More ›